These resolve true only if the listed people make an explicit endorsement and no otherwise.
If you add an answer it must be a specific individual.
I'll NA anything where an endorsement clearly happened before the name was added, but will be relatively permissive to letting vague positive statements play out.
I probably won't put much more effort than googling "$person endorse mamdani" so I welcome posting sources.
Update 2025-11-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Endorsements announced on election day (or later) will not count, even if they reveal who the person voted for in retrospect. Only endorsements made before election day are eligible.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ28 | |
| 2 | Ṁ24 | |
| 3 | Ṁ18 | |
| 4 | Ṁ17 | |
| 5 | Ṁ17 |
People are also trading
@traders I haven't seen any endorsement for the remaining options. I'll resolve all to NO this evening unless someone can find something. Anything announced today like revealing in retrospect who they voted for won't count.
@BenM https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/opinion/hochul-endorsement-mamdani.html
> I'll NA anything where an endorsement clearly happened before the name was added, but will be relatively permissive to letting vague positive statements play out.