Participates: publicly known to have participated or shares results with the public
Update 2026-07-19 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Self-reported scores from labs (without official IMO certification) can count, especially for major/frontier labs
For smaller or less-known labs, a higher bar of evidence is required before believing claimed scores
If resolution is ambiguous, an uninvolved moderator panel may be used instead of creator judgment
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,645 | |
| 2 | Ṁ551 | |
| 3 | Ṁ150 | |
| 4 | Ṁ134 | |
| 5 | Ṁ127 |
People are also trading
Does participation require scores being officially certified by IMO or can the companies run the model internally and then claim a certain score? @Bayesian
@DottedCalculator the intent is to count real cases and not count fake cases. The big companies are unlikely to make it up so internally and claiming a certain score seems fine, if it’s a very niche non frontier lab I would be more suspicious and my bar for believing them woukd be higher. Id prefer not relying on my judgement but i want to count real successes even if they arent done through a preferred channel. May need to have a uninvolved mod panel resolve instead if ambiguous.