MANIFOLD
What will be the METR AI coding uplift multiple in 2026?
41
Ṁ10kṀ37k
2027
1%
<0.8x
2%
0.8-1x
7%
1-1.2x
17%
1.2-1.4x
25%
1.4-1.6x
18%
1.6-1.8x
11%
1.8-2x
6%
2-2.5x
4%
2.5-3x
9%
≥3x

This market matches Developer Productivity: METR Uplift Study from the AI 2026 Forecasting Survey by AI Digest.

See other manifold questions here

Resolution criteria

Resolves to the speedup multiple (time_taken_by_developers_without_AI / time_taken_by_developers_with_AI) reported by the most recent METR uplift study published in 2026 using the same or clearly comparable methodology. If METR reports percent change in time taken instead (time_taken_by_developers_with_AI / time_taken_by_developers_without_AI - 1) as they did for their 2025 study, we will convert using: speedup = 1 / (1 + percent_change_in_time_taken).

If no METR uplift study is published in 2026, this question's outcome will be marked ambiguous. If multiple comparable METR uplift studies are published in 2026, the resolver may decide which one is most representative of the end of 2026 software development speedup, at their discretion (this would be the one published later in 2026, unless there was reason to believe it was less comparable to the 2025 study than an earlier one).

Eli Lifland is responsible for final judgment on resolution decisions.

Buckets are left-inclusive: e.g., 1.2-1.4x includes 1.2x but not 1.4x.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

update:

sold Ṁ250 NO

@Bayesian meta market please on whether this market resolves according to this study or a subsequent one

@Bayesian When I filled out my forecast2026.ai for some reason I just thought it resolved to the results of the next METR uplift study 💀

@jim oops no it's to the latest one of 2026 i think, i agree that was kind of a bad phrasing on my end
anyway market is here:

opened a Ṁ200 YES at 8% order

@Bayesian >3x seems underpriced then 😃

opened a Ṁ5,000 NO at 10% order

@jim limit up

@Bayesian If this market we’re getting resolved today what would the correct answer be? Where did the number 0.84 come from?

@MaxLennartson 0.84 came from the METR uplift study from early 2025 where experienced open source devs were slowed down by using AI tools working in their existing large projects.

@DavidHiggs I know that their was a 20% decrease but how did they get from 20% to 0.84?

@MaxLennartson A 20% decrease = x - 0.2x = 0.8x

@dreev How do I read the new METR report in terms of uplift?

18% decrease in completion time means someone that took 100 minutes without AI would take 82 minutes with AI right? so that's a 100/82 = 21.9% speedup, or 1.219x speedup? If i'm not goofing

previously they slowed down by 19%, so someone who took 100 minutes without AI took 119 minutes with AI. so that's a 100/119 speedup, or a 0.84x speedup. so yeah i'm pretty sure the above is correct and the current measured AI coding speedup for experienced developers is 1.22x . but the new update has the experienced OSS coders population and some other more general population iiuc, i can't speak to which one would count for the purpose of this market if this study had been the last one of 2026

@Bayesian uhhh... counterintuitive but I think yes? I'm confused by this methodology tbh.

bought Ṁ50 NO

it is so hard to bet in these kind of market im just not going to bother

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy