Best METR 50% Time Horizon in 2026
29
1.5kṀ8102
Dec 31
98%
>06h
93%
>08h
89%
>10h
83%
>12h
82%
>14h
74%
>16h
75%
>18h
59%
>19h
48%
>20h
39%
>22h
34%
>24h
27%
>30h
23%
>32h
14%
>40h
5%
>50h

See https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

Resolves to the longest 50% Time Horizon, as measured by METR, for any AI system, by the end of 2026. Answers that are passed early can be resolved early.

IMPORTANT: Resolves to all thresholds exceeded, not just to the highest one that applies. eg for a 11 hour time horizon, ">10h" resolves yes, but so does >6h and >8h

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

The members of the AI futures project have given an update and they appear to now be relying on the 80% time horizon length graph from METR for their predictions rather than the 50% time horizon length graph. This implies that a 50% time horizon is not enough. While I think markets for 50% time horizons are useful, I now think that more attention needs to be paid to 80% time horizon lengths. I am planning to create markets for 80% time horizons as soon as possible unless someone beats me to it.

opened a Ṁ10,000 YES at 59% order

@Bayesian hmmmm

@Bayesian might depend on the methodology announced by METR for those longer tasks

bought Ṁ1,500 NO

@Bayesian but I’ll take some now just for kicks

bought Ṁ30 NO

I very roughly polled METR staff (using Fatebook) what the 50% time horizon will be by EOY 2026, conditional on METR reporting something analogous to today's time horizon metric.

I got the following results: 29% average probability that it will surpass 32 hours. 68% average probability that it will surpass 16 hours.

The first question got 10 respondents and the second question got 12. Around half of the respondents were technical researchers. I expect the sample to be close to representative, but maybe a bit more short-timelines than the rest of METR staff.

The average probability that the question doesn't resolve AMBIGUOUS is somewhere around 60%.

opened a Ṁ50 NO at 65% order

@Bayesian am i misinformed or outdated now? If the doubling period was 7 months or whatever these estimations seem quite optimistic on an increase in the doubling speed!

@No_uh the doubling times havent been 7months, closer to 4.5-5 months

@Bayesian were they never 7 months? am i just misremembering? or did they seem to shift not too long ago?

@No_uh oh yeah they were 7 months, and for a while they were consistent eith 4 month to 7month range, and that uncertainty is slightly narrowing over time

@Bayesian Yes, that makes sense. it looks like I just am not up to date on the narrowing. I'm only human lmao, seems I already cannot keep up. Welp, enjoy my free mana everyone ;)

exit: and thank you as always Bayesian for responding!

@Bayesian I am personally going with a five month doubling time.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy