Will at least 3 of the Gary Marcus benchmark questions resolve YES?
18
closes 2030
81%
chance
Get Ṁ500 play money

Related questions

Will this question resolve above 50%?
4mur1c4 avatar4mur1c4
48% chance
Will this question close above 50%?
SimonVana avatarSimon Vana
51% chance
Will this question close below 57%?
TundraXD avatarTundra XD
56% chance
Will this question close above 70%?
ZalenZed avatarZalen Zed
56% chance
Will anyone get the JS function in the description down to below 100ms?
IsaacKing avatarIsaac King
12% chance
Will the CSU get more than 42%?
marktweise avatarMarktweise
18% chance
Will the world become more secular in the next World Values Survey?
cash avatarcshunter
68% chance
In 10 years, what % of the EA/adjacent community think, on balance that Wytham Abbey was a good use of money, compared to the other options at the time? (Buy yes to increase)
NathanpmYoung avatarNathan Young
66% chance
By 2025, will Paul Christiano have updated his P(AGI doom) to over 50%?
EA42 avatarEmbedded Agent
29% chance
Will the first option submitted in a free response question start out at <50% before the end of October?
JosephNoonan avatarPlasma Ballin'
32% chance
If I do a survey on fairplay at WCC, will I find the results interesting?
lu avatarlu
53% chance
If I do a survey on fairplay at WCC, will I find the results interesting?
lu avatarlu
53% chance
Will the VC 50 Years meaningfully affect p(doom) by more than 3?
(Poll) Will this resolve to the first or second option of a yet-to-be-made poll?
Stralor avatarPat Scott🩴
80% chance
What % of alignment forum karma will be pro-interpetability vs anti this year?
Jono3h avatarJono
73% chance
Will somebody clone this question?
MrLuke255 avatarMrLuke255
85% chance
Will this question have a lower than 90% chance of resolving to "yes" when it closes?
lukres avatarlukres
88% chance
Will agent foundations [eg Scott Garrabrant] end up affecting p(doom) more than 5%?
Will more than 5% of p(doom) come alone from autistic people collectively not known to de-escalate when they could have?
Will mechanistic/transformer interpretability [eg Neel Nanda] end up affecting p(doom) more than 5%?