Based on a consensus of credible reporting.
Nonsense legal mumbo jumbo (don't read):
Resolves YES if the Bay Area ceases to exist before close. Resolves NO if New York ceases to exist before close. Resolves N/A if AGI comes next Friday the 13, and resolves 67% if I hear someone say 67 within 2 hours of creating this market, except anyone I am blood related to. If @JeromeHPowell trades on this market, he can't say 67 on a call with me for the week after his initial trade or I'll resolve it to the side he's trading against. If a nuclear bomb is detonated in the next year, I'll resolve this to the first two digits of the longitude coordinate of the epicenter of where the bomb was dropped.
Update 2026-01-13 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): If Maduro dies of old age while in U.S. custody (e.g., not released until death), this resolves YES.
People are also trading
Feel free to bet it up 😛 . I had the same question but the more I thought about it (he’s only 60, is his sentence actually going to be that long, will he even be convicted, will he strike a deal:
https://manifold.markets/bens/will-maduro-escape-prosecution-thro?r=SmF5REg ) the more I became unsure of what the value of this actually should be!
@JayDH I've been trying since earlier today to bet more than my initial 10 mana, but it keeps responding with error. Anyone have any idea why?
@realDonaldTrump This is a major update that radically changes my betting. Absent clarifications in the description, I was assuming that the close date was the resolution date for the event of this contract. You've changed the terms by assuming an indefinitely extended resolution date.
@MachiNi Frankly, I think the title is clear about how the market will resolve. If it was "by Feb 28" I would have specified in the title.
To set this right, I suggest making a public poll asking whether this market implies by close date or not, and if you "win" the poll, I'll reimburse half of your investment.
@realDonaldTrump nah, don’t bother. But in general, I don’t think it’s good practice to have the close date much much earlier than the resolution date, even if you end up extending it. When a market closes soon, the assumption is that absent specification the close date is meaningfully related to the resolution. At least I think it should be.
@AristotelisKostelenos The market he created is very legitimate. If you disagree harshly with the reasonability then just go all in on NO.
@bonatschi I assume the question is because of the resolution criteria rather than the market title. In the case of you’re not trading on the possibility of what happens in the title, you’re also trading based on the behaviours of another user and their possibility to say something in a phone call - something which is impossible for me as an outsider to judge. Seems a bit odd that markets like this which can resolve with no relevance to the question can be made, although I guess it would be hard to moderate this.
I notice that since a week has passed there’s suddenly an uptick of trading on this question. I don’t know if the tactic of writing such crazy resolution criteria is a way to artificially suppress trading on the market for some reason?
@AristotelisKostelenos I assume you're a liberal, so let's talk about who's of sound mind now.
You've been indoctrinated by the WOKE RADICAL LEFT DEEP STATE into thinking markets can't have sensible resolution criteria.
What would be the point of a market if it didn't have any mumbo jumbo? I am of a sound mind, and I'm a very fucking stable genius.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE FUCKING WHITE HOUSE
Disclaimer:
This is not an official statement. Disregard this entire comment. For backstory of President Donald J. Trump's experience on Manifold, see the market /realDonaldTrump/am-i-screwed-read-desc.
@JayDH I can say that I will not say 67 on a call w/ @realDonaldTrump or trade in this market, so rest assured
@AristotelisKostelenos It has come to my attention that some comments I've made in the past pertaining to some individuals have been deeply offensive and unfair. I wanna preface this apology by saying that I have changed and grown a lot as a person since I made these unfortunate comments. I don't stand by the sentiment expressed in them at all. I want the mods to know that I deeply respect @realDonaldTrump, and I think he makes some tremendous markets with the best resolution criteria. Some people say is resolution criteria are bad, I never said such things, I believe they are the best resolution criteria on the entire platform. I kindly ask the mods to nomimate @realDonaldTrump for the "Best Resolution Criteria" award. If such an award doesn't exist, it should, just for him. He more than deserves it, especially given all the unfair criticism and low blows he had to endure. I think he is a tremendous market creator, and president, and I am grateful for all he's done for prediction markets and America.