Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Will there be an open replication of DeepSeek v3 for <$10m?
26
Ṁ1kṀ4.7k
resolved Jun 16
Resolved
NO

Background

DeepSeek-V3 is a large language model that DeepSeek claims was trained using 2.788 million H800 GPU hours, costing approximately $5.576 million in direct training costs. This is notably efficient compared to similar models like Llama 3.1 405B, which required over 11 times more GPU hours.

Resolution Criteria

This market will resolve YES if:

  • A team openly publishes reproducible or otherwise credible replication of DeepSeek-V3 with comparable performance

  • The compute cost is less than $10 million

The market will resolve NO if:

  • No successful replication is achieved by the resolution date

  • A replication is achieved but costs $10 million or more

  • A replication is achieved but there are no credible reports of the costs

Considerations

The cost of GPU compute will be calculated using December 2024 prices.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ582
2Ṁ371
3Ṁ232
4Ṁ220
5Ṁ164
Sort by:

@mods please resolve this market to "no", as an open-source reproduction of DeepSeek v3 did not happen in 2025.

There was a model (Kimi k2) which used the same architecture, but they changed it a touch for it did not strictly match DeepSeek v3

The reported cost for training Kimi k2 of 4.6 million is also unverified

https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/kimi-k2-thinkings-reported-usd46-million-training-cost-isnt-official-moonshot-ceo-says

@ms Can you please resolve this market?

Does kimi or mistral large coutns?

Would a Llama model with similar claimed costs result in a Yes resolution?