Biden's withdrawal sure looks to me like it meets the description's criteria ("Biden: Losing 2024 election / not running"), and the creator seems to be inactive. 

This seems assymetric? Bibi could lose the next election but still try to run again in the future (like Trump is doing now), so Bibi losing the next election wouldn't necessarily mean his career "ending" any more than trump's did in 2020.

 The definition for ended is clearly provided in the description. So, if the provided description had said it counted, then yes, I'd have counted it. 

 - But it also means you won't know if Bibi's "political career" has "ended".

If the market ended in 2021, then when Donald Trump lost the 2020 election, you wouldn't resolve him to to "Yes [his political career ended first]", would you?

 Because it ends in 2025, the market will not be impacted by future elections of Bibi. Thus, it is not asymmetric. 

FOR ALL LEADERS: Death, imprisonment, any ruling upheld barring them from election, exile, replacement or resigning of any kind, etc. 

Trump: Losing 2024 election / being unable to run

Biden: Losing 2024 election / not running

Netanyahu: Getting booted as PM by legislature/courts/next election

🗳️ Politics

🇺🇸 US Politics

🇺🇸 2024 US Presidential Election

#	Name	Total profit
1		Ṁ263
2		Ṁ137
3		Ṁ132
4		Ṁ129
5		Ṁ111

🏅 Top traders

Related questions

Related questions