There will be no AI clarifications added to this market's description.
People are also trading
@Jack1 This feels like an iffy answer to have because it will trade on top and clog up people from seeing better answers. It would be better phrased in the other way so it trades near zero.
@marvingardens Eliza’s point is that we’d like to bet it down so we can ignore it but it’s phrased in a way that makes us want to bet it up.
@marvingardens no. Nobody thinks it’s the correct approach so it should be near the bottom of the list but it can’t!
@Jack1 The market creator will be the one who resolves all options but imo if it isn't a correct approach then it should resolve NO.
@MachiNi I don't know what you're talking about man. I read Eliza's comment, same way you did. Is that the point of your comments, to prompt me to say "hmm I see what you mean"? What is the goal of this growing chain
@marvingardens you’re being obtuse and uncooperative on purpose, contrary to the spirit of this market.
@MachiNi Brother just tell me what you want me to cooperate with. You clearly want something and are getting upset that I'm not giving it to you. Tell me. Otherwise, let's stop posting.
@marvingardens CHANGE THE WORDING OF YOUR ANSWER e.g. to ‘maritime clues are meaningful/important’ so we can all bet it down when (soon enough) we realize there aren’t such clues.
@MachiNi If you can get the positive assent of all traders on the answer and hand me the 25 mana it took to put it up, I'll reword it to whatever you want.