
OpenAI and DeepMind have teams. The team must focus primarily on reducing existential risk from AGI. The title of the team does not need to include the word "alignment." Hiring 5 or more independent researchers also counts (assuming they work on AGI alignment), even if they do not work together on a unified research agenda. Here is the Meta AI website.
Feb 13, 2:21am: Will Meta AI start an AI alignment team before 2026? → Will Meta AI start an AGI alignment team before 2026?
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ353 | |
| 2 | Ṁ254 | |
| 3 | Ṁ163 | |
| 4 | Ṁ113 | |
| 5 | Ṁ104 |
People are also trading
pff. impossible. there are no teams at Meta AI. In fact, I'm not sure Meta exists. Zuckerberg? More like ... nothing because he doesn't exist. I have never seen or heard of a meta product. Meta has never released a research paper (proof: google "meta ai research paper". no results, see? proof this market can't possibly resolve yes.)
@L Meta has achieved many impressive results including the Cicero model for playing Diplomacy, see more at the blog: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/
Also Adam Gleave states that "The top-4 labs are DeepMind, OpenAI, Google Brain and Facebook AI Research (FAIR)" (source), although the quote is likely from last year or earlier.