How should Manifold encourage trading on long-term markets?
23
1kṀ1085resolved Jun 5
49%48%
Loans of a fixed size per market (like before)
26%26%
Leverage: E.g. say when you bet $5, you pay $1 up front and $4 later (the $4 is loaned to you)
19%19%
Funds in long term markets grow (pay interest)
3%3%
Futures: derivative market Y on the probability of market X at time T
2%2%
Continuous partial resolution of "how many days until X" markets
1.7%Other
0.2%
Leaderboards for long-term markets
0.2%
Dedicated pool of money for long term markets
0.1%
Small bets have high margin:
100% of your capital, no leverage
25% of your capital, 2x leverage
5% of your capital, 4x leverage
1%, 8x leverage
0.0%
Pay interest on invested mana
0.0%
Insurance markets - "will X happen today?"
0.0%
Discourage them instead
0.1%
Demurrage (charge interest on uninvested cash)
0.3%
Market creators can offer dividends/bounties to draw in bettors
0.3%
Curated Long Term Tournaments with their own mana pool
Currently, trading on markets that resolve in a few days is far more incentivized compared to trading on markets that resolve in months or years, because you can earn similar amounts of profits much sooner. The M$ you put into a 1-year market could be traded hundreds of times on shorter-term markets for much more profits. This is reflected in the fact that we generally see more trading on short-term markets than long-term ones - although there are certainly exceptions to the general rule.
Making predictions on long-term questions is very useful though! How can Manifold mitigate the disparity in incentives and help encourage more trading on long-term markets?
This market resolves the market consensus (but I will adjust the probabilities according to my judgement if it seems to become too much of a Keynesian beauty contest).
See related discussion on:
https://manifold.markets/JamesGrugett/how-will-loans-be-implemented-on-ju
Please do add more suggestions!
May 31, 7:31am: "but I will adjust the probabilities according to my judgement if it seems to become too much of a Keynesian beauty contest" -> as pointed out by Matt, "Keynesian beauty contest" carries different meanings/connotations. So please instead read this as: if the trading on the market looks too much like pure price manipulation instead of actually trying to predict the question I asked, then I will adjust the resolution to ignore the seemingly-manipulated prices, according to my judgement.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ137 | |
2 | Ṁ89 | |
3 | Ṁ55 | |
4 | Ṁ20 | |
5 | Ṁ11 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will Manifold allow market creators to noticeably prohibit themselves from trading on their own markets?
6% chance
Will Manifold Introduce an Incentive for Trading on Markets with Few Traders? (Proposal in Description)?
12% chance
Manifold enacts change to make markets more liquid by EOY 2025?
37% chance
Will Manifold implement another way to handle conditional markets before 2026?
35% chance
How can Manifold improve?
Ṁ3,196 bounty