MANIFOLD
Will AI Existential Risk be a partisan issue in the 2024 US election?
21
Ṁ1kṀ903
resolved Nov 6
100%87%
No partisan divide
8%
Democrats pro-safety
5%
Republicans pro-safety

Partisan divide: at least 3 times as many candidates from one party as the other make clear statements in 2024 that they are concerned about existential risks from AI

At least 10 candidates make such a statement

Candidate: congressional or gubernatorial nominee, or a presidential candidate who is in a debate

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ42
2Ṁ21
3Ṁ19
4Ṁ19
5Ṁ18
Sort by:

I couldn't find any statements from politicians taking a clear stance on this. The Bipartisan Senate AI Working Group is led by Chuck Schumer but seems to be reasonably bipartisan. There were statements from Schumer and Todd Young (R-IN) acknowledging both national security risks, near-term risks, and existential risks. Resolving No Partisan Divide since those were the only two politicians I found making statements on this.

Does it resolve N/A if the 10 candidates condition isn’t met?

@JoshuaB no, it would resolve No Partisan Divide

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy