As per Business Insider, SEC Chariman Gary Gensler says this is 'nearly unavoidable.'
"I do think we will in the future have a financial crisis . . .[and] in the after action reports people will say 'Aha! There was either one data aggregator or one model . . . we've relied on.' Maybe it's in the mortgage market. Maybe it's in some sector of the equity market," he said.
I figured it would be fun to see how likely we actually think it is. Note that the 'models go haywire' scenario is not required, only that AI be to blame in some way.
This resolves to YES if there is a period of one month during which the stock market (S&P 500) declines in nominal terms by 20% or more between market closes AND that decline is generally attributed to AI (e.g. Wikipedia says this, or whatever passes for consensus authority by 2032, I will use best judgment).
This resolve to NO if that does not happen.
This market can only resolve early if the event happens.
People are also trading
https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNoticeAttachment/7781/20260831/12308928-0.PDF
Z AI’s 2026 H1 financials just came out, and they spent only ~$319 Million USD on R&D expense (would be $639 million for whole year), compared to the projected $30 billion OpenAI plans to spend on R&D for 2026 as a whole and the $19 billion they spent in 2025.
I know people will point out that Chinese models are distilled and whatnot, but it seems to me like AI company R&D spending is way too high when you look at where they are on the model quality vs. spending curve.
On a recent podcast (with Kyla Scanlon) Tyler Cowen said a ‘crash’ will probably happen (he didn’t say when) but by ‘crash’ he meant a bubble popping (like @Zardoru asked below). Would that count?
Note that Cowen previously disagreed with Gensler (see my comment below).
@NicoDelon I asked a related question with a shorter timeline and indexed to Cowen's judgment: /NicoDelon/will-ai-cause-a-market-crash-2024
@MattLashofSullivan Close to close. I don't really care if there is a strange print for two minutes, and tried to make that clear in the description.