Will a political party aligned with the Effective Altruism movement hold 1+ seats in any nation's parliament by 2030?

1kṀ464

2030

21%

chance

ALL

Also includes legislative branch, congress, senate, house of representatives etc as long as it's at the national level.

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will the Effective Altruism movement continue to exist in 2035?

75% chance

Will a U.S. House Representative, Senator, or President/Vice President self identify as an effective altruist by the end of 2030?

36% chance

Will Destiny be an effective altruist by the end of 2025?

11% chance

Will a new party be elected to NZ Parliament by 2030?

24% chance

Will Effective Altruism noticably segregate into multiple movements within this decade?

66% chance

Will the effective altruism movement be more popular at close (2027) than as of market creation (2022)?

66% chance

In 100 years, will Effective Altruism be broadly seen as a beneficial movement by our (human) descendants?

73% chance

Will a new UK political party gain 50+ seats by the end of 2028? (In the house of commons)

13% chance

Will there be 10 new effective altruist billionaires in the next 5 years?

26% chance

Will research towards time travel be a cause area of Effective Altruism before 2030?

Sort by:

sold Ṁ14 NO

Does this count?

Hmm, I'm inclined against, because although its overall objective and HQ are somewhat EA-aligned, it doesn't seem to be a full political party, and other than mentioning their membership, the wiki pages for the leading members don't seem to really talk about it or relevant cause areas

I assume you're talking about the US? Can you make that explicit?

predictedNO

@ErwinRossen I'm talking about any nation. I only mentioned US stuff in the description because it occurred to me they use different names for their parliament equivalents.

I'd suggest the term "legislature"
What does "aligned" mean here exactly?

predictedNO

@BrunoParga has publicly declared their support of the movement on multiple occasions

@TheAllMemeingEye So, to be clear, a party for which incidentally most of its people are EA, which EA groups support, and which has priorities similar to EA would not count as "aligned" without the party itself making a statement linking itself to EA?

@UnspecifiedPerson I kinda considered that a higher bar to meet, but you're right, that should count too if somehow that happened without the declaration of support. For what it's worth I would count support within core documents such as the party manifesto or election pledges too.