Will the NYTimes correct their correction to their article on election prediction markets by the end of the week?
8
Ṁ1kṀ731resolved Oct 16
Resolved
YES1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
The NYTimes newsletter "DealBook" just published an article that erroneously compares polling numbers to betting odds. It now includes a correction that is, incredibly, also wrong while also not fixing the original error, inaccurately describing how prediction markets work. See this tweet for a reasonable summary:
This market resolves YES if they update the article again in the relevant sections, whether that's an unacknowledged ninja edit or another formal correction. It resolves YES regardless of whether the correction is yet another mistake.
Otherwise, it resolves NO at market close.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ200 | |
| 2 | Ṁ113 | |
| 3 | Ṁ48 | |
| 4 | Ṁ4 |
Sort by:
They ninja edited:
The silly "correction" around prediction markets is still around, but the ninja edit is enough to resolve.
People are also trading
Related questions
Will the New York Times positively cover Allan Lichtman’s 13 Keys prediction in 2028?
23% chance
Will PredictIt continue to have a conservative bent by end of 2028?
65% chance
When will the USA legalise prediction markets for elections?
Will the New York Times create a market on Manifold by end of 2027?
10% chance