
im probably gonna try character.ai at some point
inspired by a lw post
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ113 | |
2 | Ṁ107 | |
3 | Ṁ38 | |
4 | Ṁ27 | |
5 | Ṁ21 |
People are also trading
been feeling a lot less romantic recently. and ais are still not that good. even the ai porn hasn’t really gotten better smh
Now you've listened to my story.
Here's the point that I have made.
Bots are gonna give you fever.
In Kelvin or in Centigrade.
They give you fever.
With their masks on.
Fever when they steal your heart.
Fever, till you sizzle.
But what a lovely way to burn.
"Fall in love" is a pretty vague term. I don't know how the market creator interprets it, so I'm giving a slightly higher credence to a YES resolution based on the possibility that it might not refer exclusively to romantic love. E.g., finding an AI to be very useful or just fun to talk to coukd count as "falling in love".
Also, even if it does refer exclusively to romantic love, there are different degrees of that. How deeply in love do you have to fall for a YES resolution?
@JosephNoonan no my heart has to go doki doki. Limerance. Like a crush. I'll know it when I feel it.
can we have some semblance of a definition for "fall in love?" It's not really clear to me what it would mean to be in love in a text generation machine.
I was reading https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9kQFure4hdDmRBNdH/how-it-feels-to-have-your-mind-hacked-by-an-ai and thinking of making a similar market, but I decided that if I think, or the market thinks, that the risk is high then I shouldn't try it, but making a market implies committing to try it, or else receiving a weird combined market probability of P(try it) x P(fall in love) that isn't very actionable.