🏅 Top traders

[unendorsed]

I would like the title of this to be "Will @acc be #1 for a day in 2023?"

@NathanpmYoung yes, that would better describe the market than the current title. Curious why your comment is showing as Comment Hidden to me

@firstuserhere I hid it because I thought it was wrong. It's cumulative profits right? So the title is basically accurate?

@NathanpmYoung oh I see. I misunderstood it as well, then

@NathanpmYoung For handling a comment you no longer endorse, I think editing it to say "[deleted]" is better than hiding, since hiding usually means the market creator hid it for some reason.

How can it be checked?

Looks like @Acc has been removed from the leaderboard. Does that mean this resolves N/A?

@IsaacKing No, I was careful to specify in the description that total cumulative profits are the relevant criterion, not leaderboard position.

@acc is currently the #3 trader (or #2 if you exclude highly sus profits from the 69% market) and is making around Ṁ10k / week, but some factors that could prevent its rise to the very top include:

• @jack being too good a trader

• Users figuring out how to exploit the bot (warning: many have tried and failed)

• More bots start market-making, eroding profit potential

• @Yev reverse engineers the strategies and re-writes them using an FPGA for greater speed (after gaining access to the internal api)

@SG (re the highly sus profits, don't worry, they should be distributed to their rightful owners)

@SG How dare you call my market sus!