Market answers resolve YES when that Manifolder has received a valid "double it and pass it on" managram (or was the 0th or 1st link), as seen in the main market below. All other market answers will resolve NO when the chain is shamefully broken.
Add yourself or others to the market following the pattern of using their @ handles.
"Other" will be replaced with the handle of the next user if they were not listed at time of managram. The "Other" market answer will continue to stay open until it is overwritten or until the chain is shamefully broken. If overwritten, then I will make a new "Other". Mods are encouraged to resolve "Other" YES if I am slow on the action. Please do not add a Manifolder after they are in the chain, else it will be N/A'd after investigation.
Note: The main market's live running count should be the number of YES resolved market answers here minus two if both markets are up to date.
I cannot trade on this market.
Main market:
Dashboards:
1,000π Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | αΉ385 | |
| 2 | αΉ182 | |
| 3 | αΉ140 | |
| 4 | αΉ73 | |
| 5 | αΉ64 |
People are also trading
@121 Careful. If we can guess your move and add them to the market listings, this trade is bankrupt.
@Conflux You are in the chain now, but the main market asks if you will perform the "double it and pass it on" action.
@Conflux Basically, on the main market, we are counting the π emojis in the chain. Here, on this market, we ask who's names are in the chain.
Iβm going to post a different take on things (copy post from main market).
I promise that if I am included in the chain, I will NOT double it and pass it on. Here is my promise and logic instead:
I donβt want this chain to end. I think itβs a cool experiment. At the same time, exponential growth canβt continue indefinitely.
I will put any gifted mana received to good use. I have what I believe to be pretty impressive profits on a small net worth/balance.
I am limited in my ability to earn more profit not based on available questions but based on my account balance instead. I donβt want to take out further loans but I do want to be able to make bigger bets.
So, if you ever get to a point where you feel things are unsustainable, Iβm asking for consideration for charity. I want to be able to continue the chain in the future, and sending me the funds (at some point), aids that larger goal.
Yes, this post is selfish. But there you go - a different take on things.
@MRME I'll follow through with my obligatory "Shame!" outburst, but I'll let the community judge this approach.
I made a market about what happens next
https://manifold.markets/SimonWestlake/who-will-i-double-it-and-pass-it-on
I love how @SimonWestlake trading "Other" up to 99% disincentivises people from adding their handles to the market if they want to be in the chain.