@mods resolves yes

@HillaryClinton The mod guidelines have two categories to look at in this type of situation where a creator didn't respond or do anything in their market:

• "Assuming the resolution is obvious" -- in this case, it seems like a lot of people agree it is a Yes, but based on what I saw in the other thread there is some ambiguity about whether the same document, but less redacted counted. And an open question as to whether there were completely new documents. So at least for me it wasn't 'obvious'.

• "If the close date has been reached, and the resolution is ambiguous" -- the close date has not been reached

There's no obvious step for me to take in this situation other than advising that pinging @Quillist would be a really good step. Another option is to hope some other moderator comes along who thinks this is 'obvious'. With over 30 moderators on the roster it may happen. (But it didn't happen in the first 4 days after you sent your ping....)

@HillaryClinton As far as I know, this is ambiguous - all documents he released were previously released, but some had significant sections that were previously redacted but are now unredacted. Do you still think it should resolve yes?

@jacksonpolack every other bet has resolved yes relating to this. On this website And others. @mods resolved yes.

@HillaryClinton That isn't really a helpful argument in this case. And also untrue. This market on the same site is asking a similar question and also has not resolved:

/Destiny3a152/trump-declassifies-jfk-files-in-fir

If you have an actual argument, go ahead and make it. But so far you have just begged to resolve yes and lied about why.

(If @Quillist shows up and decides it resolves Yes or No or nothing or whatever else, then that's in their domain.)

@Quillist resolves yes