Why was PredictIt shut down?
11
58
resolved Jul 31
70%53%
Kalshi lobbying
30%26%
Unknown
2%
@tnim__ lawsuit
12%
Violating the no-action letter, as outlined in letter 22-08 https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-08/download

For what reason or reasons was PredictIt shut down?

All of those which have clear evidence for them at resolution time will resolve positively. I will consider clear evidence to be my own 90% certainty or a statement from the CFTC or an admission of guilt from PreditIt.

I may consider other kinds of statements from PredictIt, but these seem open to bias.

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ96
2Ṁ49
3Ṁ14
4Ṁ6
5Ṁ3
Sort by:

Resolving questions like this is kind of ugly. This is my proposed resolution.

bought Ṁ20 of Violating the no-act...

It seems like from the CFTC's denial of Kalshi's latest application that they just don't like prediction markets?

answered
Kalshi lobbying

From the Kalshi CFTC application linked above:

Contracts on political control of Congress available to US participants have been trading for nearly a decade. Since 2014, a similar contract has been available for trading on an unregistered trading venue that purports to operate under a No-Action Letter that was issued by the Division of Market Oversight in 2014 and granted relief to operate without complying with a number of aspects of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations.

The Exchange is proposing to bring such contracts onto a fully regulated exchange operating under the core principles applicable to a DCM, with participant funds safeguarded at a DCO operating under the core principles applicable to a DCO. The Exchange believes it is time to offer these widely used but unregulated contracts on a fully regulated basis so that U.S. persons can hedge risks arising from political control on a market with robust safeguards and transparency.

answered
Kalshi lobbying

Apparently we might find out what happened because someone filed a FOIA request to the CFTC. https://manifold.markets/jack/will-a-foia-request-reveal-that-kal

answered
Violating the no-action letter, as outlined in letter 22-08 https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-08/download

@ahalekelly I doubt i’m gonna resolve this positively, because they didn’t say specifically why, but i’m open to argument

answered
Kalshi lobbying
bought Ṁ50
Good discussion of this on latest SSG pod, particularly starting around 18:45: https://pca.st/episode/930bd486-1de6-446a-aab6-9c68893504b8?t=1133.0
answered
Kalshi lobbying
Oh Kalshi just applied for CFTC approval to have election markets https://kalshi-public-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/regulatory/notices/CONGRESS%20for%20posting.pdf
answered
Unknown
bought Ṁ10
If no answers meet the burden of proof in the description
answered
Kalshi lobbying
I doubt we'll ever find out what really happened though
What's wrong with the CFTC's current statement? https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8567-22
@horse they claim that PredictIt hasn't operated in accordance with the original authorization letter, but it doesn't seem to me like PredictIt has meaningfully violated any of the terms that they claim in letter 22-08. It could be that PredictIt is operated by https://www.aristotle.com/, a for-profit company. Or maybe #9 (advertising), considering that I have seen PredictIt ads on Twitter, but the fact that I followed PredictIt on Twitter means the ads were probably fairly targeted. Seems like excuses because to hide their real motives. https://www.cftc.gov/csl/22-08/download
If PredictIt was clearly operating in violation of the original letter, wouldn't the CFTC state the violations more clearly? The purpose of the letter wasn't to explain their reasoning, it was written to be intentionally vague so that there's no specific claim for PredictIt to dispute.
answered
Kalshi lobbying
@ahalekelly What do you know that I don't?