Simple disagreement is not enough to resolve YES - it has to be big enough of a split that one could call them a "trump critic." If I see any of them identified as "trump critic," or otherwise splitting from team Trump in a significant way, that'd be enough to resolve YES. Getting fired and then going on CNN to dish out some juicy dirt would also be enough, for example. Basically - who's gonna burn some friendships?
Please do not submit anyone who can already be characterized as a "trump critic," or who has already split from Trump's team due to criticism.
This market's resolution is subjective, so I will not bet on this market. In the case that I am unable to resolve this market, I leave it in the hands of any moderator without any shares on this market.
1,000People are also trading
@shankypanky Hardly new for her, she tweeted this within two weeks of 1/6:
@Marnix same until I saw this tbh
I know she's occasionally critical (hadn't seen the tweet Nathan posted above) but I thought she was still somewhat on the team. but idk what her story is really and I think it's best I don't try to piece it together.
Completely disagree, this is just a stone, someone needs to throw a rock
It will come.
Not unlike the period she spent on the road with trump UNTIL she posted that linzy Graham is gay, her post was removed almost emidiatlly and she was pulled out from under trump π π€£ and then sent home, never to speak of it again, however she was correct, but called it out the wrong way.
There is plenty more to come.
At this point, had she been put on here, I'd probably have resolved Laura Loomer to YES. I think her split is significant at this point!
@Marnix good point! she's had a few tweets in recent days(?) that are critical of the administration.