Will resolve to MKT at close
Possible arbitrage opportunity?
(Oh wait, it was reposted below so never mind.)
@TomShlomi Would anyone here object to changing the resolution criteria to either include a clause against blatant manipulation or use a poll instead? Or we could create a new market like that.
Here, I made a new one that resolves to physicist opinion after we've discovered all the mysteries of the universe that it's possible to discover.
I think your's is substantially different because you're including the multiverse in your definition of the universe
@MartinRandall https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.Aerfish.UniverseSplitter&hl=en_US&gl=US (use quantum randomness to decide which way to bet!)
A narrow definition of universe is no because of quantum. A wide definition is no because of some part of the multiverse running on non-deterministic math.
@MartinRandall I second your first point, but why posit a non-deterministic multiverse?
@BionicD0LPH1N If it has all possible math in it then some of that math is going to be non-deterministic, no?