data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7b4/ed7b44cfd1828738d471cfbde1beb03cd10d030b" alt=""
In 2030, a majority of experts will think open sourcing Llama 3.1 405 was a dangerous move in hindsight.
11
100Ṁ2682030
16%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
In 2030, a majority of experts will look back and agree that there was not significant justification for believing with greater than 90% confidence that Llama 3.1 405 would not provide the foundation for nefarious actors to produce existentially risky artificially intelligent systems.
Will resolve to a consensus of experts in 2030.
If no clear data exists that demonstrates the opinion of experts, a poll will be used for resolution.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Related questions
Related questions
Will many open source advocates agree frontier models have crossed capability thresholds too dangerous to open source?
10% chance
Will an open-source LLM under 10B parameters surpass Claude 3.5 Haiku by EOY 2025?
82% chance
Will there be a disaster caused by open source developers doing unsafe things with AI by 2028?
62% chance
Will Llama-4 be (open sourced and) as good as GPT-4?
82% chance
Will a Mamba-based LLM of GPT 3.5 quality or greater be open sourced in 2024?
73% chance
Will an open source LLM (Vicuna, Alpaca, etc.) exceed ChatGPT interest by 2030?
59% chance
Llama release results in successful legal action against meta before 2025
4% chance
Will Humanity deploy any new technology in an unsafe way by 2030? (Contra LeCun)
92% chance
Will SB 1047 become law? Will Meta open source Llama 4 (or equivalent)
Will Humanity deploy any new technology in an unsafe way by 2030 according to LeCun?
52% chance