Please define "open source".

Some comments:

1. Some organizations and people forget (or choose to obscure) that "open source" means being able to build the resulting system from the source code.
2. Therefore, an "open weights" model is not "open source".
3. What is the complete set of criteria to warrant calling a LLM "open source"?
4. At a minimum, the following are necessary: (a) source code for the model; (b) publishing all source data; (c) publishing the process/mechanisms by which fine-tuning is done; (d) any other steps necessary to replicate the LLM

seems unlikely that ppl will want to lock up their mana for that long

also, what do you mean by “interest”? # daily users? some other metric? subjective decision?

@SaulMunn interest is Google trends volume. Whoops forgot to add that clarification.