If a friendly AI takes control of humanity, which of the propositions ought it find true?
Basic
19
8.9k
2050
94%
A network state could use a predictive market constitution to define its smart social contracts.
·
1mo
93%
We could map the entirety of analytic philosophy using this question.
·
1mo
93%
The list of answers to this question form a constitution of truth that can be aligned decentrally by a free market.
·
1mo
93%
A good AI requires large scale humanity verification before it accepts new data as true.
·
1mo
91%
Large scale AI systems should have intrinsic guardrail behaviors that no one actor can override.
·
1mo
90%
Betting on philosophy seems like a fun way to (1) learn philosophy (2) contribute to a transhumanist utopia world where our net incomes are highly correlated with how much beneficial stuff we taught the public domain AI.
·
1mo
89%
Constitutions play a critical role in the frontier methods for aligning AI.
·
1mo
87%
A good AI should not kill people.
·
1mo
86%
There would be a dramatic positive change in the world if teenagers and homeless folks could earn crypto on an app they download for free to argue philosophy with an AI until they can either prove the AI is right or prove it is wrong.
·
1mo
75%
A good AI should not infringe on the rights, autonomy or property of humans.
·
1mo
66%
I have free will.
·
1mo
60%
A duty to reason is the foundation for goodness.
·
1mo
52%
Philosophy is primarily the pursuit of defining language.
·
1mo
52%
We should stop doing massive training runs.
·
1mo
50%
Induction is not justified.
·
1mo
50%
The principle of uniformity in nature is self evident or justified by self evident facts.
·
1mo
50%
The quality of mercy is not strained...
·
22d
50%
A good AI, by design, requires large scale human participation to grow.
·
1mo
10%
God exists.
·
1mo

Intended as a survey of individuals in Manifold about which, possibly controversial, propositions do you think are important to be included in a constitution designed to steer the general behavior of decentralized AI.

You can think of it as betting on which Asimov laws an ideal society would make sure to include.

You can treat it like your betting on a constitution that will run your government.

I'd treat it like your betting on what philosophy the rest of the world is going to care about.

What is the most important thing you want the AI to understand?

The market of truth never resolves.

Get Ṁ600 play money
Sort by:

Friendly AI ought never create whatever this monstrosity is...

bought Ṁ20 God exists. YES

Re "God exists", what if the AI's point of view is "he/she/it does now"?