This market will resolve YES if there is a political/sports/etc scandal that receives national attention that is appended with "-gate", alla Watergate / Bridgegate / Deflategate, etc... It has to receive attention of the Legacy media.
A sarcastic reference (such as on The Daily Show) or attention from only a non-mainstream media source (looking at you, Breitbart and Twitter) will not be sufficient to resolve YES.
#Speakergate has been spreading on Twitter ('cause that's what it's fucking called, Elon!), for example, but unless this becomes widely adopted in the mainstream, it will not be sufficient to resolve as YES.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ624 | |
| 2 | Ṁ130 | |
| 3 | Ṁ130 | |
| 4 | Ṁ55 | |
| 5 | Ṁ47 |
@KevinBlaw https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2024/03/26/how-kate-middleton-kategate-memes-mutated-into-conspiracy-frenzy/?sh=7b3f63e424d3 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/25/conspiracies-tagged-kategate-grow-despite-kensington-palace-video (as hashtag rather than as generic name)
@fwbt Thank you for the sources. The Forbs article talks about the origins of KateGate and places it in the date range of this market. I think we have a clear YES resolution.
@HankyUSA I am tending toward YES here. I just want to make sure that this isn't just a twitter thing.