This would include e.g. if I started using ChatGPT or Bing's chatbot every day. It doesn't include e.g. if some broader service I use comes to make use of a language model in a subtler way. e.g. if Gmail uses one for suggested autocompletes that doesn't count.
I won't bet on this market. I don't know of any large language model that I currently use daily.
ETA: by 'daily' I mean roughly every day, not necessarily literally every day.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ44 | |
| 2 | Ṁ28 | |
| 3 | Ṁ22 | |
| 4 | Ṁ20 | |
| 5 | Ṁ20 |
Added you to my Claude account. You can also try it on https://poe.com. Claude is better at reasoning through boundaries and emotions, flexible reasoning, and generally superior to ChatGPT in reasoning, though not superior in knowledge and coding. Try Claude instead of ChatGPT for a bit :)
@firstuserhere Claude 1.3 ("Claude+") is superior to both ChatGPTsx in many domains because of the way it was aligned.
@ampdot i guess i will give it a shot. I did compare gpt4 and Claude+ on a set of coding related tasks. Gpt4 was way superior imo. I also tried experiments with providing code and asking to generate in depth documentation for some functions, removing the functions, clearing the context, and asking to recreate those functions from description. Gpt4, for python, Scala, and cpp was able to produce working code in decreasing #of times but outperformed Claude+. But my sample size is small so..
Anyway, will try on those type of tasks you mentioned
@firstuserhere I already stated Claude+ wasn’t superior for coding.
By the way, Katja, you can get Claude+ on web by subscribing to Poe.com now.
@ampdot
In general I find:
For creative writing: GPT4 = Claude+ > Claude-instant > ChatGPT
For logic/general intelligence: GPT4 > ChatGPT = Claude+ > Claude-instant
@harfe I meant 'newly' actually—just to exclude any that I currently use daily without noticing. Though by 'daily' I also mean 'roughly daily' not literally every day.