![](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffirebasestorage.googleapis.com%2Fv0%2Fb%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fo%2Fdream%252FD_7jZMELV8.png%3Falt%3Dmedia%26token%3D8d7273bc-c9cc-4015-b712-7b00043608a3&w=3840&q=75)
Resolves YES if I find strong evidence that Tom Cruise has gone on a cruise before the end of the year. Otherwise resolves NO.
(Doesn't count any instances of Tom Cruising before market creation.)
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ235 | |
2 | Ṁ59 | |
3 | Ṁ36 | |
4 | Ṁ29 | |
5 | Ṁ25 |
@EliTyre He must have actually been on a cruise, not just have been cruising. (Otherwise any plane ride would count.)
If it's for a movie that's fine. But it has to have been a real cruise, not just a soundstage mocked up to look like one.
Justin Timberlake front property
![](https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/mantic-markets.appspot.com/o/user-images%2Fdefault%2Fvyw9MhZF-o.png?alt=media&token=5b8a1e95-7ee8-4b94-8c81-c1d90edc4d5b)
@DavidMathers Oh, hmm. As per the title I'd say yes, but as per the description I'd say no. I failed to consider the difference between the verb "to cruise" and the much more restrictive noun "a cruise".
The title is obviously the primary purpose of this market, so I feel like I should edit the description to match it, but that would likely increase the probability a bit and seems unfair to NO traders.