Must be an attack on a datacenter specifically, and not a part of an existing conflict that targets "lots of things, including datacenters".
@MartinRandall Hmm, yeah, if the later intended target is the datacenter, that counts. (Once it's actually hit.)
Seems to have happened in Ukraine already, so I'll bet it is going to repeat soon (e.g. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/03/15/internet-technicians-are-the-hidden-heroes-of-the-russia-ukraine-war/ shows a photo of "Kyivstar data center after an attack"). Unless "air strike" would be defined narrowly to exclude both aircraft-launched cruise missiles and drones. Verification might be a problem though....
@IsaacKing wouldn't it make more sense to tie the resolution to claimed rationale for the attack? You might otherwise find yourself in the difficult discussion on what is a war... Also an airstrike on data center for reasons other than AI still looks way more plausible even without larger conflict. mana link needed I lost just a bit.
@Lovre The discussion about the proposal(s) appears to me to focus on weird longtermist speculation while forgetting about the dangers of things that are already happening or could happen in near future, so there might be a metaphor here 😀
@fejfo Presumably it wouldn't be unprovoked; the precipitating country would probably have asked politely first.