MANIFOLD
Will anyone interfere with Alex Honnold's Taipei 101 free solo?
45
Ṁ100Ṁ2.8k
resolved Jan 25
Resolved
NO

Any external interference, such as might be attempted to win a real money prediction market bet.

  • Update 2026-01-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Interference counts whether or not it is successful at preventing the climb from succeeding

    • The creator will not trade in this market

  • Update 2026-01-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Market will track the actual solo attempt whenever it happens (not bound by the original close date)

    • If the event is cancelled entirely:

    • Resolves Yes if cancellation is due to expected interference and publicly announced

    • Resolves No if cancelled for mundane reasons (e.g., Honnold's decision, building owners changing minds)

  • Update 2026-01-23 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): If the climb is cancelled for mundane reasons (e.g., Honnold's decision, building owners changing their minds), the market will resolve No (not N/A), because if there is no climb, no one interfered with it.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ26
2Ṁ20
3Ṁ20
4Ṁ17
5Ṁ16
Sort by:
bought Ṁ25 YES

Would cloud seeding count?

@DanzoAlerantos Depends whether the cloudseeding plane is also towing a banner advertisement for Polymarket.

Resolves to YES, obviously this is a conspiracy using Jewish weather control devices.

I of course knew I needed to specify what happens with dates, but as this is more about interference than success, this market will track his actual solo attempt whenever that happens.

If the event is cancelled entirely, resolves Yes if that cancellation is because of expected interference and that is publicly announced at the time, resolves No if it is cancelled for more mundane reasons like Honnold deciding not to do it or the building owners changing their minds.

@EvanDaniel My apologies for not getting that in the original description text, it should have been there.

@EvanDaniel I don't think "no" is a fair resolution if canceled for mundane reasons, n/a seems more appropriate

@Bandors If there is no climb, no one interfered with it. (Unless the interference is before the climb, and causes the cancellation.)

This market will not resolve n/a, for all the usual reasons that it is bad to resolve things n/a.

@EvanDaniel "Will anyone interfere with Alex Honnold's Taipei 101 free solo?"

Cancellation means the referenced event didn't occur, so 'will anyone interfere' never became answerable.

@Bandors If the climb doesn't happen, then no one interfered with it; also all such climbs were interfered with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuous_truth

If you don't like it, you're welcome to make your own market, and you're not required to bet, but this is the end of this discussion as regards the specifics of this market: it will not resolve n/a under any circumstances.

If Manifold implements a first class n/a mechanism, I will absolutely use it, and this market would be a fine case to specify that. Ternary Y/N/underlying doesn't happen by close is a fine way to structure a market and I look forward to writing markets with it. But for now, this is my market and it will resolve in this way.

Does this market only refer to the initial scheduled attempt, or also rain dates?

bought Ṁ10 NO

Are there any markets with real money on this climb?

Does the location of the stunt have a strong criminal justice system?

@Eliza It's in Taipei, Taiwan. I'd say yes.

bought Ṁ10 NO

@EvanDaniel That would lead me to lean No!

I won't trade in this. Interference counts whether or not it is successful at preventing him from succeeding at the climb.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy