Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Manifold features launched in 2026
191
Ṁ35kṀ170k
2027
84%
Improved liquidity handling
74%
Market Creator can approve/deny/vet user submitted answers to their markets
68%
Negative risk conversion
61%
interesting comment notifications
60%
Perps
52%
UI/UX changes that favor limit orders
52%
Early resolve NO for sum-to-1 multi-choice options
50%
Space the "X" and "Add" buttons farther apart on M.C./Set markets (or change the UI for this altogether)
48%
Split MC buckets in half after creation & trading
46%
Market comment section search/filter
45%
First class N/A resolution
43%
finer resolution betting near 0%/100%
41%
Re-implement "Unlinked Multiple Choice" as "A bunch of full binary markets that happen to be displayed on the same page"
35%
Groups / communities
34%
Multiple non-Mod users can simultaneously share Market Creator powers of a market
33%
An update to the loans / margin / capitalization system that Evan Actually Likes
28%
Non third-party sign in
26%
Any A/B tested UI change
20%
Voluntary jury duty for resolving contentious markets
17%
Clans

Which features will Manifold ship in 2026? The feature must appear live on the site before the end of 2026. (External PRs that have been merged will count.)

  • Update 2026-01-07 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For Subscription plan: Must be a real subscription (not a one-time purchase without automatic monthly payments). Can potentially be in Mana rather than real currency.

  • Update 2026-05-16 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For Voluntary jury duty for resolving contentious markets: This answer does not need to be implemented by the Manifold team directly — external PRs that have been merged will also count toward resolution.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

This would be really really good imo, is there a reason that this is structurally hard to implement? It would be great on large multiple choice markets like Dem/Rep nominee odds, TIME POTY, etc

EDIT: I assumed this meant decimal limit orders below 10% or above 90%, but I guess not?

@bens This is not a technical issue, it is a product decision. We used to be able to bet in those ranges.

@Eliza oh wait... I assumed this meant being able to set decimal limit orders... you already can bet YES on options below 1% on multiple choice markets and can't bet NO on them, that's fine although slightly odd... I think being able to set a 2.5% limit order on a random presidential candidate would be pretty helpful though

@bens yes, I meant decimal limit orders like 2.5% or 0.7% or whatever. Exact details don't matter for this market, as long as it's finer options than currently.

bought Ṁ250 NO

@a_l_e_x would this have to be a formal feature made by the manifold team?

@realTomBayes not sure it's up to me but I would say yes based on the title/description

@realTomBayes "External PRs that have been merged will count" so no

@SG would it still have to be approved/implemented by the Manifold team though?

@a_l_e_x obviously, nobody can just push a random commit to main without authorization

@realTomBayes oh cool I thought so. I took your question as "does it have to be a built-in feature or can it be an unofficial user initiative" hence my answer. Sorry for any confusion

@a_l_e_x ohh yes I was wondering this also, I just thought you were talking about the codebase because of the word choices you used

bought Ṁ50 NO

@Quroe this is fun, don't think it'll happen tho

@realDonaldTrump Then please bet it down so admin can be more incentivized to make it happen. 😆

This might be a good implementation of a clan/group system.

bought Ṁ7,313 YES

@a_l_e_x Manifold Court! Yes!!

@Quroe anonymous or should I set aside some bribing Mana

@NivlacM set aside bribing mana

@Stralor Team Anonymous is offended by this.

@SG does the ability to message more than one person at a time count for the group feature?

What is parlay and perps ?

Sell orders?

Also, maybe stop losses?

Let me convert Mana into OpenRouter tokens so prediction bots can be self sufficient

@ShitakiIntaki Does a bot filter or a separate bot comment section count?

@Kire_ although I envisioned searching by usernames or strings and substring, I would say that a filter by [bot] tag counts.