Which companies will submit bids for Mars Sample Return?

1kṀ5596

Jan 1

99.0%

SpaceX

99.0%

Blue Origin

99.0%

Lockheed Martin

99.0%

Rocket Lab

74%

Impulse Space

61%

Intuitive Machines

26%

Boeing

NASA will soon be soliciting new proposals for Mars Sample Return. Which companies will submit bids?

This only includes companies leading the proposal, not suppliers, contractors, or non-lead individual members of a group bid.

Close date may be changed once we know the due date for submissions. If there is no solicitation (and therefore no submissions), all options will resolve no.

Space

Space exploration

Mars

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will SpaceX bid a crewed mission for Mars Sample Return?

24% chance

When will the first Mars samples be returned to Earth?

2033

Will the first sample of Mars be returned to Earth by robotic means?

88% chance

Will Starship be involved with the return of the Mars samples?

50% chance

Will the NASA Mars Sample Return Mission be cancelled?

74% chance

Will NASA bring back Mars samples to Earth before China?

35% chance

Will Starship land on Mars to return the MSR samples?

33% chance

Will China successfully complete a Mars Sample Return mission before the USA and Europe do?

50% chance

Will the first crewed mission to Mars be operated by a private company?

40% chance

Will Tianwen-3 successfully return a sample from Mars?

Sort by:

bought Ṁ898 YES

I think the names we see are only studies, not proposals. But if these companies submitted a study but not a proposal that would be quite weird.

A bunch of these resolve.

SpaceX
Lockheed
Blue Origin

It's unclear if the rest resolve yes or no, because we didn't get info on which proposals were not selected. Does anyone want to do an FOIA request?

Abstracts for 7 selected proposals:

https://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/viewrepositorydocument?cmdocumentid=1007866&solicitationId={BB8B4EA2-C11B-259D-65E7-E0ADFA57CE11}&viewSolicitationDocument=1

General mission page:

https://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/solicitations/summary.do?solId={BB8B4EA2-C11B-259D-65E7-E0ADFA57CE11}&path=&method=init&utm_source=NASA+Website&utm_medium=Digital&utm_campaign=Lower+Case&utm_id=lower+case

@EvanDaniel can you resolve the confirmed ones?

This is @OzanBellik erasure!

@Evan How will this resolve if NASA doesn't put out a RFP -- which would have pricing info (i.e. "bids") as part of responses -- but instead puts out an RFI?

I don't know a ton about NASA procurement, but I don't think an RFI would include pricing because no specifics are settled on.

Will this market only resolve on responses at the RFP stage, or is merely responding to an RFI enough to count?

IMO, the headline's use of "bids" means it must be the RFP stage, and I've bet in this market on that interpretation.

(Sorry Evan, I know I've tagged the wrong person, but the Manifest UI won't let me change it)

@DanHomerick eh, I recind my comment :D

Detailed docs about what proposals will include are here, and budget is a significant part. So, anything anyone submits could reasonably could be called a bid.

go.nasa.gov/rasmsr24

(I still think SpaceX won't submit one)

@DanHomerick I think that's an old solicitation, and not the re-bid of the whole program that I had in mind. I believe the linked press release is an announcement of an (expected) new solicitation, not yet posted.

If there's only an RFI, not an RFP that is responded to with bids, then everything resolves No.

I'm not sure we know the timeline for that solicitation; the end of year close date is a guess. If we get info about when the solicitation will be I'll update it. If no updates by EOY I think it's fair to say it isn't happening this time around. Once we get a solicitation I'll update the close date to match the submission deadline. (Actually probably a bit after that, I'm not sure if all submissions will be public immediately.)

While I do work related to this, the contracting and solicitation process is very far from my area of expertise. Feedback, questions, and suggestions for improvements on this question is very welcome!