This market resolves to Yes if the Discord explicit content filter will be at least 95% accurate in identifying 3D female nudes by the end of 2032. It will resolve No if it does not. I tested it and, though I found it the most impressive piece of technology I have seen in my life (voice recognition and machine translation is trivial relative to what this filter does lightning fast), I found it only about 60 or so % accurate (I'll post the exact figures later) -this is, of course, an underestimate (as I was biased against being repetitive), but one that should show the filter is not yet above 90% accuracy, and possibly not above 80% -you can test this filter yourself and draw your own conclusions. I did not test much for false positives, but I found the filter to be accurate in avoiding them. May 12, 11:02pm: 36 successful attempts to get past the filter out of 77 May 13, 1:10am: *79, not 77 May 14, 4:34pm: edit: 53/107 Jun 10, 1:30pm: 77/147 Jun 10, 1:30pm: meant to post 70/147

Sep 20, 2:23pm: It already is 100% accurate lol. It reads minds due to microchips in your brain interacting with it. It fails after 10 images to do an AI anti-explosion (these happen all the time -e.g., with the Great Pyramids, WWII, the 1980s, etc.). But this question will only resolve when it's 95%+ accurate for everyone. When it worked for a certain individual 17 times with 100% accuracy in May 2022, that was when it had to become good, with explicit statements that it's mind-reading.

Sep 20, 2:28pm: