Will ChatGPT be Time's 2023 Person of the Year?
318
1.3K
2.2K
resolved Dec 6
Resolved
NO

Will any version of ChatGPT be Time's Person of the Year for 2023?

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ723
2Ṁ403
3Ṁ301
4Ṁ280
5Ṁ149
Sort by:
bought Ṁ730 of NO

TIME has announced Taylor Swift as the Person of the Year https://x.com/time/status/1732379462644220275?s=46

boughtṀ50YES

@Joshua you think they might deviate from the shortlist? Or extend it like "Sam Altman and ChatGPT"?

sold Ṁ142 of YES

I wouldn't rule it out.

bought Ṁ1,000 of NO
bought Ṁ50 YES from 9% to 10%

Close competitor... with Sam Altman.

bought Ṁ10 of NO

ChatGPT types away
Imparting knowledge each day
But Person of the Year? Nay.

bought Ṁ10 of NO

ChatGPT is the AI king,
Who can answer anything.
But Person of the Year? No way.
ChatGPT's not human, okay?

bought Ṁ275 of NO
predicted NO

Does AI count as "yes" for this?

predicted YES

@LucasGoldfein56b1 No -- not unless in specifying AI they list ChatGPT specifically by name. For example, "AI" sub-captioned "ChatGPT, Bing, and Omega". Generally this appears on the cover (as in "Volodymyr Zelensky and the Spirit of Ukraine"), so unless there is no caption at all, that's what I'll go by. If there is no caption on the cover, but a clear equivalent in the article, I may count that.

bought Ṁ20 of NO

There's at least one strong competitor for this title in the AI space: "The AI"

bought Ṁ100 of NO

Sidney

bought Ṁ5 of YES

@MartinRandall "any version of ChatGPT" - pretty sure that includes Sydney

predicted NO

@jonsimon It didn't descend from the ChatGPT weights. If the rumors are true that it's tuned from GPT-4 then it doesn't even have a common ancestor.

predicted YES

@MartinRandall Setting aside the lineage question, what do you think the chances are that the writers at Times would appreciate this difference, or feel compelled to convey it to readers even if they did? I think it's overwhelmingly more likely that they would nominate "ChatGPT" which has basically become a household name rather than the codename for an integrated search bot only accessible via waitlist, aka "Sydney"

predicted NO

@jonsimon Fair point, but I think "Sydney" and other non-ChatGPT models claim to be a "person" more often, and we have some time before the 2023 person of the year.

Admittedly this is the logic that let me lose lots of mana betting against Zelensky in March 2022.

bought Ṁ55 of NO
predicted NO

Time Magazine has selected a non-human twice before.

  • The Computer (Machine of the Year, 1982)

  • The Endangered Earth (Planet of the Year, 1988)

Even if we start at 1982 to yield the highest possible base rate, that gives us 2 out of the last 31, or 6.5%

predicted NO

You (2006)

predicted NO

@ForrestTaylor that’s abstract (so is The Spirit of Ukraine) but still human