What will be the reason cited the next time the doomsday clock moves closer to midnight?

1kṀ3410

resolved Dec 4

100%50%

Nuclear Weapons

13%

27%

Climate

Other else

Other Technologic

1.6%

Other Natural (Astaroid, Natural Disasters etc)

1.7%Other

The original I created here: https://manifold.markets/DavidShawe0kg/what-will-be-the-reason-cited-the-n

did not have the answers linked. This has fixed it.

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Name	Total profit
1		Ṁ286
2		Ṁ200
3		Ṁ178
4		Ṁ151
5		Ṁ114

People are also trading

Will the Doomsday Clock move closer to midnight by January 31st, 2026?

78% chance

In the next 5 years, will the Doomsday Clock reach 4 or more minutes to midnight?

10% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock be 60s (or less) to midnight by end of January 2026

26% chance

What time will Doomsday Clock be at in 2026? (Read the pinned comment for market rules.)

Will the Doomsday Clock be forwarded or rewound in 2026? (Read the pinned comment.)

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 10 minutes or more to midnight before 2040?

35% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 5 minutes or more to midnight before 2040?

36% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 20 minutes or more to midnight before 2050?

24% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 30 seconds to midnight by 2029?

42% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 20 seconds to midnight by 2030?

Sort by:

Resolved 100% Nuclear, since it seemed like the headlining concern and the independent multiple-choice version allowed us to resolve everything that got mentioned.

@DavidShawe0kg Can this resolve?

@DavidShawe0kg this can be resolved right?

https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2025-statement/

IMO it'd be OK to resolve:

Just 'nuclear weapons' yes as it is listed first
Nuclear, climate change, other, AI (other being biological) with equal or descending weight (actually maybe AI > biological as it is cited twice, once as exacerbating biological and once more by itself)