🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,537 | |
| 2 | Ṁ1,369 | |
| 3 | Ṁ457 | |
| 4 | Ṁ400 | |
| 5 | Ṁ258 |
Resolving to YES as per results of a poll of Trustworthy-ish users (4-1)
Sorry for not clarifying the description earlier.
I also bet on this with the assumption that it won't be extended anymore, especially since the close was a month after leagues close. I'm also surprised that @CodeandSolder
didn't issue any clarification on the possibility of extending. I also want to add that I read the comment from him stating that he will be updating the description, and he didn't, so I thought that this is the final extension.
It seems to me that a large amount of traders traded on the assumptions that it will be resolved by the close date, but I'm not sure what the best resolution here would be.
@Shump I forgot I didn't update the description, my bad, the comment did state the intention is to wait until admins make a decision, I should have put that in the description
@CodeandSolder Can you please explain why this was not resolved at the time of the event in question (at the original resolution date)?
When betting on this question, there was no reason to believe that it would stay open and unresolved indefinitely.
If there is any relevant information justifying a probable (or even possible) YES resolution in spite of the clear evidence to the contrary, please share it with us here.
@HelenD like I clarified nearly a month ago the goal was to wait until admin decision, my bad for not also clarifying in the description
@CodeandSolder Do you have any indication that a new admin decision is going to happen? As far as we can all tell, there was a decision on this matter a month ago (i.e. Marcus did not place first.) Do you have any information that indicates that this decision will likely be reversed? If so, please share it here.
@HelenD There was a lot of talk about it in the other market: https://manifold.markets/CodeandSolder/will-pc-be-punished-for-blatant-pro-a94a127ec6c8#rZ3pmB6867r4Y5ZrBolt
@HelenD
I posted your comment in the trustworthy-ish member discord channel and then this poll:
@CodeandSolder Please elaborate. What makes you think there is a possibility of reversal?
@HelenD the messages shared by Joshua in a comment above, messages preceding them and public communication by Trustworthy-ish users prior to me getting access to the private channel. Also the price of this market.
@CodeandSolder I don't see what you are referring to. Can you cleary explain yourself here?
@a2bb "it's not even about the rating, I generally refund people if they lose because of reasonably my mistake to reduce the risk of trading in my markets" - CodeandSolder
@ChameLeon Didn't pay close attention to this market, so I don't have much of an idea about these trading period changes
@ChameLeon I'm really annoyed at how lightly people make accusations of bad faith here, at the time I extended the time the total on YES was like M1000 and I offered to refund anybody impacted, clarifying the plan is to wait until judgement is passed
@CodeandSolder understandable. It's annoying, when actions of a small group affect the whole community. A few bad examples doing "insider trading" affecting people who are not involved in market manipulations.