Resolves "YES" if a significantly observable faction of the general public in US starts calling AI "woke", being "for AI" or "pro-AI" as "woke", and/or using a derogatory nickname for AI or for people who are not "against" AI. Let's say five, otherwise unrelated, reports of things like group We Stand With Kids starts efforts to intimidate school boards to remove AI from school computers, alumnus of Amity Institute gets harassed for wearing "Go AI" shirt, cars get bumper stickers "PROUD PARENT OF A STUDENT WHO DOES THEIR OWN HOMEWORK" then stories spread that a group calling itself "AI ARMY" starts punching in their windows.
Does not count if the person calling AI "woke" is Ta-Nehisi Coates or a public figure with a demonstrable vested interest does something that could provoke culture war.
I don't consider the terms "pro-AI" and "anti-AI" to be meaningful. This is about hostile behavior among groups in the general public based on that terminology.
Includes but not limited to all scenarios contemplated in this market:
1,000