If AI doesn't destroy the world, will it be primarily because it lacked the means, motive, or opportunity?
5
61
175
2051
46%
It lacked the means
44%
It lacked the motive
11%
It lacked the opportunity

This market is inpired by /EliezerYudkowsky/if-artificial-general-intelligence and /IsaacKing/if-we-survive-general-artificial-in , as well as this blog post by @JonathanMann. It strikes me that the two markets above have too many options/too much jargon, which makes them sort of overwhelming. The taxonomy laid out in the blog post is easier to understand.

This resolves according to my judgement, guided as much as possible by the description in the blog post (I will not bet). I will resolve it when I feel it is clear that at-least-human-level AGI exists, or at the market close date in 2050, whichever comes later.

Get Ṁ200 play money