If AI doesn't destroy the world, will it be primarily because it lacked the means, motive, or opportunity?
5
175Ṁ1062051
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
56%
It lacked the means
36%
It lacked the motive
7%
It lacked the opportunity
This market is inpired by /EliezerYudkowsky/if-artificial-general-intelligence and /IsaacKing/if-we-survive-general-artificial-in , as well as this blog post by @JonathanMann. It strikes me that the two markets above have too many options/too much jargon, which makes them sort of overwhelming. The taxonomy laid out in the blog post is easier to understand.
This resolves according to my judgement, guided as much as possible by the description in the blog post (I will not bet). I will resolve it when I feel it is clear that at-least-human-level AGI exists, or at the market close date in 2050, whichever comes later.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will humanity wipe out AI?
14% chance
Will AI Cause a Deadly Catastrophe?
30% chance
If an AI wipes out humanity on Earth, what will be true of this AI?
Will AI wipe out AI before the year 2030?
4% chance
Will AI wipe out AI before 2030?
9% chance
Will AI cause human extinction before 2100 (and how)?
If AI causes human extinction before 2100, how will it happen
Contingent on AI being perceived as a threat, will humans deliberately cause an AI winter before 2030?
33% chance
If AI wipes out humanity, what will it make of the universe?
Will anything other than AI wipe out humanity by 2100?
5% chance