The question will be considered resolved positively if there is a significant and involuntary change in the government of a country due to internal political upheaval, external military intervention, or other unforeseen circumstances, as confirmed by credible sources such as news organizations or official government statements, after July 10 before September 1. Examples of such changes may include a military coup, political impeachment, a popular uprising, or a foreign invasion that results in the overthrow or dissolution of the government.
The question will also be considered resolved positively if a sitting prime minister or president dissolves the government and calls for new elections due to internal political upheaval or other unforeseen circumstances, as confirmed by credible sources such as news organizations or official government statements, after July 10 before September 1.
The question will be considered resolved negatively if there is no significant and involuntary change in the government of any country due to internal political upheaval, external military intervention, or other unforeseen circumstances between July 10 and September 1. If there are minor changes, such as a reshuffle of cabinet members or a change in prime minister or president that does not result in a significant change in government policy or structure, the question will still be considered resolved negatively.
See the May and June iterations of this market below for detailed conversation about many different scenarios and how they would resolve. Please propose any hypotheticals for clarification in the conclusion, but ground them in a reference to a real world event related to the potential resolution of this market and not things like "what if the AI takes over the government". This market has proven to produce fun and engaging conversations about political volatility and government stability. Please be kind to each other!
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ1,001 | |
2 | Ṁ884 | |
3 | Ṁ571 | |
4 | Ṁ529 | |
5 | Ṁ504 |
i
@BTE New Niger leader announced by the military-backed coup: https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/28/africa/niger-coup-general-state-tv-appearance-intl/index.html#:~:text=Bazoum%20took%20office%20in%202021,independence%20from%20France%20in%201960.&text=%E2%80%9CThe%20hard%2Dwon%20achievements%20will%20be%20safeguarded.
@jskf I didn't realize it was at 99 percent. But that seems perfectly okay when it has 100 percent already happened.
@BTE was gonna post an own based on your calibration graph at 99% but your calibration is actually quite good :(
@BTE open to your discretion re: uncertainty around the events. sounds like you're convinced and I'm happy either way. buying in some more in case you're keen to resolve now, but I won't begrudge waiting for more info
@BTE I would wait for a new Niger leader to be announced. But there is no doubt that the government has been overthrown. The coup leaders have successfully suspended political activity and the military has sided with the coup. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/niger-president-says-democracy-will-be-saved-following-coup-2023-07-27/
@jskf o snap ok. i wasn't sure what you meant by track record. if it was about resolving questions, calibration graph (on that it says: track record), or if it was something else entirely.
https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/soldiers-nigers-presidential-guard-blockade-presidents-office-security-sources-2023-07-26/
https://www.ft.com/content/0543a8f0-f8f3-4cc6-a38c-c504df81dc5d
https://aje.io/3s60su?update=2290980
Doesn't look good for the government. The army supports the coup.
@AlexbGoode The army support basically resolves this YES. The president has been removed and the majority party headquarters attacked. How long should I leave this open you think?
@BTE this market is always slightly subjective. But there is no rush. Wait a few days to see what's going on
The president of Niger is currently being held by captive by leaders of a military coup. It appears to have been on going for the last 10 hours with the plotters having the upper hand. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/26/1190189843/nigers-president-has-been-detained-prompting-fears-of-another-coup
I think "involuntary" is the wrong word to use here. It makes it sound like the change needs to happen because of some unavoidable and unplanned natural event, such as a dictator having a stroke, or all members of parliament spontaneously bursting into flame or a meteor hitting Washington DC.
In the case of a military coup, it's not right to describe the change as "involuntary" someone clearly wanted things to change and took concrete, purposeful actions to make it happen.
@Odoacre It is "involuntarily dissolved" or "overthrown". Not sure if my grammar holds up, but the goal is that the involuntarily only applies to the dissolved.