What will my diet look like over the next year?
Basic
19
Ṁ498
resolved Jun 7
65%50%
Pescatarian
35%11%
Vegetarian
3%Other
1.0%
Vegan
2%
Beefatarian
7%
Flexitarian
0.2%
Meat eater
3%
Something similar to Agrippa (outlined in comment)
3%
Potatoes
15%
Bivalve vegan/ Ostrovegan
5%
Ameliatarian
I'm currently eating a pescatarian diet, but could be persuaded to go down to vegan or up to "beefatarian". I'd say I'm primarily interested in productivity, followed by animal suffering, followed by longevity, with climate a distant 4th. (of course, taste and cost are factors too!) May 16, 10:12am: Inspired by https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ddLLBJWo88sW2sL9R/what-share-of-people-are-vegetarian-vegan-or-flexitarian May 16, 10:12am: I'll resolve this proportional to the number of days I identify with a particular diet, from now til market close.
Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

I think I identify as more vegetarian than pescatarian; I think I consume fish about 2-3 times a month now. 65/35 or about a 2:1 ratio makes sense in my head given that most of the year (before I met Rachel), I identified as pescatarian.

Still eating eggs and feeling a bit guilty about it; I think I'd be happy to make a $5000 purchase offer to whoever makes https://sideways-view.com/2021/03/21/robust-egg-offsetting/ a real thing.

@Austin very quickly, have you tried getting kala namak (indian black salt)? It contains very high sulfur content that makes it taste "eggy" such that you can make tofu scramble and stuff that is quite similar to scrambled eggs and/or mimic basically any egg flavouring you want.

You can get "runny yoke" type stuff from fancy vegan places but idk how they do that and it's probably not practical to do often for yourself.

@MarcusAbramovitch I'm generally fine with egg substitutes like Just Egg when cooking myself; but the larger issue (also outlined by Paul) is that lots of tasty food made by restaurants and bakeries already include eggs in them. I'd like to offset this, the same way some people voluntarily offset their carbon emissions on flights.

@MarcusAbramovitch (but thanks for the rec, I hadn't heard of kala namak and just ordered some to try)

@Austin ah, i wouldn't be so upset if you ate these every so often and that was it.

I'm vegan and I probably inadvertently consume a bit of egg every year. My best guess would be ~5. Like, I'm sure every now and then a noodle dish at a restaurant or something similar had some egg in it or a baked good had some and it said vegan but wasn't actually or w/e.

If you are 99% vegan except for some baked goods or the occasional ice cream outside the house, that's good enough for all but the most puritanical of vegans. Especially because most of the gains is just realizing that non-human animals and their suffering are worthwhile.

@MarcusAbramovitch i think it is better called "rock salt" than black salt

@Austin Can this resolve?

@ as described in https://open.substack.com/pub/thingofthings/p/on-ameliatarianism (ie no farmed fish, poultry, or eggs - except arguably Certified Humane)

Seems reasonably close to what you’re already doing? At least, based on your last comment, do you think pescatarian is a better descriptor than ameliatarian?

I'm going to try to convince you that ethically, this is a very good diet and that it doesn't sacrifice that much compared to pescatarian on taste/convenience and greatly improves welfare.

I'm afraid that pescatarians, while not causing harm to the animals that we feel the most connection to, often cause more animal suffering than omnivores. This is because when you fish/shrimp, you cause the suffering of far more of them than if you eat 1/500th of a cow. You eat say 10 shrimps (who had their eyes cut off) or about 1/10th of a salmon.

Depending on where you are the world, bivalves (mussels, oysters, clams, scallops) can be decently cheap. That said, they also basically are rich in all the things people think vegans don't get or can't get easily. Protein, B12, zinc etc.
In terms of welfare, the evidence for their sentience is minimal at best. They don't have a CNS etc.

In terms of productivity, cooking of bivalves is fast and tasty.

I also agree with others that reducing egg consumption is incredibly important for animal welfare.

@MarcusAbramovitch Thanks! In practice (especially since dating @RachelWeinberg) I've cut down a lot on fish eating; when I started pescatarianism I (possibly motivated-ly) believed fish didn't feel pain, and now I do.

I don't particularly enjoy bivalve meat so might drop that for purely taste reasons? Though could give it another shot in the future.

I've also cut down egg consumption a lot with Rachel, though eggs are very high on my "list of tastiness things". I believe the most expensive eggs in supermarkets to be ~neutral-to-positive in welfare, and would personally be extremely excited to purchase egg offsets eg as outlined by Paul Christiano https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qJxzBpubLB7Fr3oM8/demand-offsetting

I would strongly dispute the part about expensive eggs in supermarkets.

How do you like to eat eggs that make you want to not replace them? Scrambled eggs? Fried eggs? Baking? etc.

"Fried egg on top of things" is the only thing I haven't replaced

I feel morally clueless about chicken suffering, but my instinct* says that it's possible to humanely raise hens, albeit rarely done.

*I originally said my gut, but my gut may have unconscious bias in this area.

/MartinRandall/can-i-buy-humane-egg-certs-by-20240

@Austin Vegetarianism is pretty underrated
@DevanshPandey It seems overrated to me given the relative moral importance of reducing egg consumption over reducing meat consumption.
I guess its just a question of overrated among who. Underrated by most.
@Austin meat is good for you! Help build muscle, make you strong! Iron, vitamins, and minerals all in tasty form! Make you manly man, girlfriend market number go up!
You will participate in Slime Mold Time Mold study.
@Yev oh God I hope not
@Austin doooooo it
@Austin I think that eggs are per calorie a lot more worthwhile to reduce than beef. I'm not much of a knower about free range eggs and other allegedly humane options. But I would be very skeptical of any marketing terms. It's certainly the case that despite the fact that "cage free" is a regulated marketing term to make consumers feel better, there can be no doubt that "cage-free" hens simply live EVEN WORSE lives and more are needed per egg due to higher mortality. So the amount of goodharting, and the FDA's lack of giving a shit about preventing goodharting, is just staggering and I wouldn't feel more confident about any other feel-good marketing term. First google result of "free range eggs" seems to validate this heuristic. https://www.eater.com/2019/7/17/20696498/whats-the-difference-cage-free-free-range-pasture-raised-eggs
USDA* not fda
I would not assume that any set of supermarket-egg-producing hens lived lives at all recognizable as humane (or even particularly imaginable at all) , unless I saw their conditions for myself / from a trusted non-industry auditor (aka. some activist with a camera). All of my further research into the topic seems to validate the heuristic, eg https://www.quora.com/How-are-free-range-chickens-farmed/answer/Jas-Osborne As this author points out, enforcement even of these rather misleading standards cannot even be counted upon AT ALL. I only know one person who has worked in chicken farming and at one point she personally killed around some insane number, like a hundred thousand chickens, with a bat, due to an infectious disease in the farm. So even sampling in the most random way I can, I am 1 for 1 on "conditions are much worse than even whats legal".
@Austin Betting for interia.
@hongalex pretty safe bet tbh
I think the most likely way for you to diverge from this, and in fact the most likely way for me to do so, would be less dairy restriction. Though as I said I think that oat milk is probably just healthier anyway. Unmentioned but if not for the company of Sapphire I would have probably consumed wild-caught fish in the Bahamas. That said I do not really seek the opportunity to eat wild fish, or really care that much for eating fish, nor is the opportunity very frequent to begin wtih. So even if not for Sapphire I think in all practical terms I would just not eat seafood I also am not very concerned morally about eating molluscs, though I am concerned about the fact that they are disgusting snot creatures, and do not eat them. But this bet is just a bet on the constraints you will apply, not constraints on your willingness to consume snot creatures, which by the way is very gross.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules