How many Supreme Court justices will vote that Trump's birthright citizenship executive order is unconstitutional?

1kṀ5990

2029

47%

25%

14%

4 or fewer

Refers to the first such case the US Supreme Court rules on in Trump's second term. If no such case is ruled on during Trump's first term, resolves to "4 or fewer".

If the decision involves multiple votes with different outcomes, any justice who votes that the order is unconstitutional at least once will be counted. E.g. if there are two different 6-3 votes and the majority changes by one justice between them, this market resolves to "7".

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

How will the Supreme Court rule on Trump's impoundment actions if case is heard by August 1st 2025?

How many supreme court justices will Trump appoint during his current term

How many justices will be appointed to the Supreme Court during the next presidential term?

If Trump tries to run for a third term, how many Supreme Court Justices support him?

0.62

Will birthright citizenship end in the United States by the end of Trump's term?

12% chance

Will Donald Trump appoint at least 2 Supreme Court Justices during his second term?

44% chance

Will SCOTUS rule that 14A doesn't grant citizenship to US-born children of undocumented immigrant parents by 2030?

20% chance

If Trump is president, will the Supreme Court be 7-2 conservative before 2033 Inauguration

44% chance

Will Clarence Thomas rule with the Majority on Jack Smith's Supreme Court petition to see if Donald Trump has immunity?

Sort by:

How does this resolve if some aspects are found to be unconstitutional but others are not?

The rules are intended to cover that case. If 6 justices find that section blorb is unconstitutional then the bracket the market resolves to will be at least 6.

@zax You didn't answer the question as I understand it. For example, what if 7 justices rule the order is wholly unconstitutional, and 2 justices rule that the constitution provides birthright citizenship to children of legal permanent residents but not the children of people here illegally. All nine justices would have ruled that part of the order is unconsitutional, but only 7 would have that the whole order is unconsitutional.

I'm not sure what the confusion would be. The order either is or is not constitutional (even just in part). If 9 vote that part of it is unconstitutional then the market resolves to 9.

Nitpicking: I think you should explicitly state this is about the Federal Supreme Court. Some states (eg California) also have supreme courts with "justices"