πŸ‘πŸ‘Ž Manifold Leadership Approval Rating [Market Index]
πŸ’Ž
Premium
381
αΉ€720k
2525
38%
chance
Bet on love
Increased Creation Costs
Profile & Portfolio merged
Manifold.Love sunset
New Numeric market type
Browse ui update, color fill binary mc markets
Austin leaves Manifold team
1-99 bet limit on some markets
Mana economy changes
New mana USD prices
Mana transaction fees enabled
Pivot announcement
Pivot update delaying changes
Updated portfolio graphs
NA ability removed
Night before pivot selloff
Pivot: Spice/Points added, Mana devalued, Market cost changed
Creators earn 100% fee up to 1000
Higher question tiers
Play/Mini tier and expanded mc options
Manifest ends
Quick limit order buttons
Sum to 1 MC markets limited to 1-99%
paginated multi choice markets
James leaves to focus on Manicode
Sweepcash launch
Mana trader bonus returns
Txn fees removed
Re-enable ability to NA markets
Up/Down votes on comments

Use mana to let the team know what you think about how they're running the website. 100% means everyone is happy with the direction Manifold is going and the team behind it, and 0% means something has probably gone tragically wrong.

  • Does not impact profit rankings

  • Permanently open market, will not resolve.

Other Approval Ratings:

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-69a6850abbfb

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-d7689b01293f

/strutheo/what-will-manifolds-approval-rating-da311ac4ea95

Get
αΉ€1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

Doesn't it defeat the purpose of this market if staff is holding limit orders lol?

@TimothyBandors are you counting me / Matt as staff? fwiw we are volunteer mods and not employed or anything.

@Bayesian Ah, I thought mods are paid staff.

@TimothyBandors i wouldn't worry too much about the "purpose"/functionality of this Very Serious market. the #1 NO holder is an account that does literally nothing but bet NO on this market each day. the actual % is meaningless it's just a place for people to discuss updates.

Dynamic scale graphs look like that on new markets:

@ProjectVictory I hate graphs that don't start at 0. What's even the point of having the graph if the scale is basically random ?

@Odoacre yeah i really dont like the dynamic scaling and would turn it off if i could

AI assisted markets just dropped πŸ€–

bought αΉ€100 YES from 40% to 41%

@TheAllMemeingEye I have my doubts on the high-quality criteria part but I'll definitely check it out.

@ProjectVictory yeah I have a feeling it's more like "quick and easy automated criteria"

Like the new closes in 7, 30, 90 days filters!

bought αΉ€25 YES at 44%
bought αΉ€2,000 YES

uh oops

Love the πŸ‘ / πŸ‘Ž in the comment section! Awesome!

4 traders bought αΉ€154 YES
2 traders bought αΉ€165 NO
bought αΉ€50 YES

@strutheo lets you dislike yourself but not like yourself

@Qoiuoiuoiu *also bug report - when hovering over the dislike button but someone else already disliked it the tooltip reads "like"

bought αΉ€57 NO

@10thOfficial absolutely hate it. don't turn this place into a circlejerk like reddit and silence principled bold contrarian voices like myself or trolls (like myself). The election cycle was pretty non-toxic because if you hated something you could just ignore it or have to articulate why, instead of just mindlessly pressing a button, or piling on someone. Turned out to pretty useful since a lot of Trump commenters were not popular to say the least

@dlin007 I don't agree with the trolling or the Trump part, but I do agree I already have reddit for this, I'm not downvoting anyone here, if I disagree with something I take the 2 minutes to articulate why on a reply :/

@dlin007 I agree that positive reinforcement of popular takes is a terrible incentive. Reddit, X, Insta, etc are all toxic epistemic blackholes because of the incentive structure created by rewarding the popularity of a take.

this is popping up on unresolved markets that are still open now.

Uh this is really annoying for me, I would prefer it if these were two separate buttons instead of having to click a tiny little image to see which markets were affecting my net worth.

@Qoiuoiuoiu yeah I liked them better separate

Suggestion:

Not everyone is on the site 24/7 or even remembers the questions they created after a few months. I find myself asking people very often to resolve their markets. Instead of me going into comments and typing "@whoever This can resolve YES/NO, thank you!" please make this a one button press. Ask for Resolution or Request Resolution, where pressing it and selecting YES/NO automatically pings the creator and starts the 24 hour countdown. If they do not resolve, it goes into the mod queue for review/action. Thank you!

@10thOfficial good idea yes! ping for resolution

"Request Resolution" + YES/NO + text box for explanation/source (pings creator)

After thinking a little about it, am unsure it is a good idea.
The problem is that with this system people would not be able to answer if it should not be resolved for a reason or another, or see if a resolution was already asked for.
And if you make a system which allow for it, it starts to not be different from another comment system.
And we can already ping creators and moderators with their names.

I think the value added, would be to differentiate the reasons for the ping, but a more advanced notification system would be better for this.
Another value could come from some markets where there are a lot of comments, but then, a more advanced way to organize comments by kind could be better (something like : "resolution/criteria discussion", "humor", "information on subject"…)
But I think most of the value would come from a more advanced notification system, sorting comment by kind seems complex and not that useful.

@dionisos I guess, I’m just sick of doing this many times a week.

Β© Manifold Markets, Inc.β€’Terms + Mana-only Termsβ€’Privacyβ€’Rules