Is Claude Mythos real
20
Ṁ100Ṁ2.3kresolved Apr 7
Resolved
YES1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Resolves Yes if the leaked documents broadly correspond with some current existing as-of-yet unreleased model, whether or not it eventually takes the name Mythos.
Resolves No if “Mythos” was actually just an early codename for Opus 4.6, or otherwise doesn’t map onto any existing model with the described properties from the leak.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ37 | |
| 2 | Ṁ26 | |
| 3 | Ṁ22 | |
| 4 | Ṁ16 | |
| 5 | Ṁ14 |
Sort by:
The Fortune article has an Anthropic spokesperson responding to questions and talking about the model: https://fortune.com/2026/03/26/anthropic-says-testing-mythos-powerful-new-ai-model-after-data-leak-reveals-its-existence-step-change-in-capabilities/
I feel like that should be sufficient to resolve yes?
People are also trading
Related questions
Claude Mythos (Anthropic) release date
Which of the following will be true about the rumored “Claude Mythos”?
Claude Mythos output cost ($/Mtok)
Claude Mythos METR 50% time horizon
When will a Claude Mythos Preview-level coding model be available to the general public?
7/25/26
Will "Mythos-class" model be called Mythos?
59% chance
Ratio of Claude Mythos METR 50% to 80% time horizon