should they exist? No. Even in a world where everyone's needs are met and everyone is happy and no one is getting evicted or starving because of rising food costs, trillionaires shouldn't exist. I won't appose them if they do exist but I won't advocate for them by saying that they should exist

Depends. No if hundreds of millions of people are still living in horrific poverty (current situation). Yes if there's enough for everyone (hypothetical utopia).

@TheAllMemeingEye aka pauperocentrc view of the world

That is $122 net worth for every human in earth. Ridiculous!

@Jack1 Should be distributed equally, so they can spend it on bad food and TV subscriptions!

@Jack1 that'd be more useful

@skibidist how about medical supplies for the Democratic republic of Congo so they have gloves and clean water when dealing with Ebola patients?

@Jack1 Still, your average Ebola patient lives a pretty uninspiring life. Want to help them, fix the structural problems, make a virus that will uplift their IQ, or, alternatively, recolonize the shit out of it.

@skibidist sus af comment

@TheAllMemeingEye he's butthurt because he kept betting long against AI and now it's all going south

he's lashing out against the socialists. it's an understandable response

@0xseraphim “but muh ebola” is such a boring, dumb and easy attractor in the space of all thought

@skibidist fair play