I'll use GPT-5 Thinking with context from Grokipedia and comments on this Market for resolutions.
This resolves based of its state at the end of 2025.
Update 2026-01-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has provided additional reference materials for resolution:
Polls to be considered:
Is Grokipedia a lot better than Wikipedia?
Is Grokipedia as good as Wikipedia?
Is Grokipedia right-wing?
Chat log: Available at the provided markdown pastebin link
These materials will be used alongside Grokipedia context when GPT-5 Thinking makes resolution decisions.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ237 | |
| 2 | Ṁ197 | |
| 3 | Ṁ190 | |
| 4 | Ṁ114 | |
| 5 | Ṁ106 |
People are also trading
@CommanderKeen "I'll use GPT-5 Thinking with context from Grokipedia and comments on this Market for resolutions."
At the bottom of most pages, such as https://grokipedia.com/page/Transistor, it says:
"The content is adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License."
Therefore, it is sourcing from Wikipedia.
@patrik "Critics, including scholars and commentators from varied ideological backgrounds, argue that "woke" ideology fosters a rejection of objective truth, logic, and debate in favor of subjective narratives rooted in power dynamics and oppression frameworks, often leading to institutional capture and policy failures."
https://grokipedia.com/page/Woke_(disambiguation)#pejorative-and-critical-interpretations-in-contemporary-discourse
I'm not sure whether this section would count
@MiguelLM Read the description pls. You can post evidence in the comments but there is no point in tagging people...
I'll use GPT-5 Thinking with context from Grokipedia and comments on this Market for resolutions.
@patrik OK
I was using the reply button to post a comment about each specific response, and this automatically tags the response creator.
@256 shall we count a dedicated section as YES? or do you need a separate article?
https://grokipedia.com/page/Tesla_Autopilot#teslas-reported-crash-statistics-20192025
@MiguelLM This section obviously isn't a list of crashes. The expected article would describe each incident, or each incident that was severe enough to have gotten in the news.
@patrik you can resolve YES
"The Clinton body count refers to a long-circulating conspiracy theory"
https://grokipedia.com/page/Clinton_body_count
@WoahD_ musk called this a beta, and it's probably pretty different from the intended thing (eg it doesn't allow editing through grok), I wouldn't count this as the release.
https://grokipedia.com/page/Clinton_body_count
The Clinton body count refers to a long-circulating conspiracy theory
@makoyass okay I'm seeing zero negative bias in the elon musk article. There's a long controversies section but none of them land a solid hit. I'm not sure whether this constitutes positive bias, it could also just be that the worst things elon has done aren't easily provable (eg, that time an "overeager intern" modified grok's prompt to prevent it from acknowledging an embarrassing thing about him) or widely enough known to be notable.
It doesn't mention the nazi salute? Alas, I am in the camp who thinks he's just enough of a spaz to do one unintentionally, so I don't know whether to call that bias.
@makoyass Oh, no, the Diablo fake gamer thing, that was extremely public, extremely embarrassing, it gets no mention here, but it could also fall into the "not notable" basket. His Wikipedia article does mention it, but it doesn't seem to be widely understood the extent to which he was lying and the extent to which it was embarrassing, so I'm not sure if it indicates bias to omit it.
@makoyass "It will say something negative about Elon Musk" should resolve YES even if only one tiny negative thing is said, and many other major critics are omitted, and tons of good things are said.
Both “It will be positively biased with respect to Elon Musk” and "It will say something negative about Elon Musk" can resolve YES at the same time, and it is likely they will do.
@MiguelLM I was only talking about the bias question here (the "it will say something negative" question is silly)