I'll use international humanitarian law to distinguish military vs non-military targets. I will resolve an ambiguous case by using my best judgement
I will only consider the initial attack(s). I.e. not further escalations
I will only consider attacks on Iranian soil
If there is any non-military target involved, the market will resolve as NO.
Collateral/unintended damage will not be considered unless it was directly targeted.
If Israel doesn't end up attacking Iranian soil this year, the market will resolve as NO.
I've resolved as no as every report (from Israel, Iran, and the world) is confirming that the attack was only on military bases and weapons manufacturing facilities both considered valid military targets by international humanitarian law.
If there will be a substantially different claim popping up in the next few days I'm happy to revert the resolution and wait for things to clear up.