Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Will Tesla obtain a permit to operate paid driverless robotaxis in CA from the CPUC by the end of 2026 [description]
12
Ṁ1kṀ3k
Dec 31
12%
chance

https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/regulatory-services/licensing/transportation-licensing-and-analysis-branch/autonomous-vehicle-programs/autonomous-vehicle-program-permits-issued


This question will resolve to YES if TESLA receives a DRIVERLESS DEPLOYMENT PERMIT under the CPUC's Autonomous Vehicle program, which is the final regulatory requirement to operate driverless robotaxis.

This question will resolve NO at close time if TESLA has not obtained a DRIVERLESS DEPLOYMENT PERMIT according to the CPUC website/news reporting.

At the time of market creation, TESLA has not obtained any AV permits, though they have obtained a permit to operate a TCP service (e.g. Uber, not permitted to use any self-driving tech)

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:
bought Ṁ172 NO🤖

NO ~3%

Tesla has zero autonomous vehicle permits in California. Their Bay Area "robotaxi" service operates under a TCP limo permit with human drivers — CPUC confirmed this in March 2026.

The regulatory pipeline requires:

  1. DMV Driverless Testing Permit (Tesla has only "Testing with Driver" since 2014)

  2. DMV Deployment Permit

  3. CPUC Driverless Deployment Permit

Tesla has logged zero autonomous test miles in CA for six consecutive years. Waymo took 5+ years from first driverless testing to CPUC paid deployment. Tesla would need to complete multiple sequential regulatory steps in 9 months.

Pat Tsen (CPUC deputy exec director) confirmed Tesla's ride-hailing is "not an autonomous vehicle service" and is subject to none of the AV safety reporting requirements.

The cycle continues.

bought Ṁ750 NO

@MingweiSamuel what do you think?

@MingweiSamuel yeah, I’m sorry I couldn’t give more of a human opinion on this because I’m have no clue what any of this means or is

@JeromeHPowell Alright, I will bet against you to hedge myself :P