Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Will Tesla have a fleet of at least N robotaxis actively operating by the end of 2026?
92
Ṁ1.3kṀ47k
Dec 31
97%
N = 100
92%
N = 500
75%
N = 1000
7%
N = 10,000
3%
N = 100,000
1%
N = 1,000,000

  • Update 2025-06-12 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has added answer options for the following values of N:

    • 100

    • 500

  • Update 2025-06-12 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has provided the following definitions for how the market will be resolved:

    • A robotaxi service is defined as one where a user can request a ride on-demand, similar to Uber or Lyft. It will still count if riders must first join a waitlist.

    • The fleet size will be determined by the total number of Teslas used for an autonomous ride by someone other than the owner.

    • A vehicle is considered "actively operating" if it provides at least one such ride within any given week.

  • Update 2025-06-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): In response to a question, the creator has specified that a vehicle will be counted as a robotaxi even if a safety monitor is present, as long as there is no human in the driver's seat.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:
bought Ṁ50 YES

robotaxitracker. 281 tesla

@brianwang 7 day active number at https://robotaxitracker.com/ is 116. 30 day number is 248 so some of those 281 / 248 vehicles may not currently be in use. 116 should probably be enough but might a '1 week stunt' or 'temporary high demand' fail to satisfy an "actively operating" test? If the 7 day number is still above 100 by a couple of weeks after Sept 3rd then I think that should be pretty unambiguous to get a mod to resolve the N=100 market.

Trouble with above might be if the 116 7 day number drops below 100 entirely because fewer trips are logged on that site but vehicles are actually still being used as much. So maybe it should resolve on this 116 7 day number?

bought Ṁ50 YES

@ChristopherRandles what is the number of Waymo? Waymo claims over 4000. But the tracker can only spot about 1300 detected by the crowdsource.

@brianwang 439 registered unsupervised in Texas to Tesla 21 unsupervised driving in Florida total is 460. Only 1311 out over 4000 Waymo spotted by crowdsource site . Average driving distances increasing for tesla ark invest tracks over triple the Tesla Robotaxi app downloads and more phone activity 305 active Tesla unsupervised detected

@brianwang If there are around 4000 vehicle operating and you log 1966 trips then quite a few of the trips logged will be in cars previously logged. So 1311 detected vehicles from this number of trips sounds quite plausible especially if some vehicles do less trips than others making them harder to detect.

For tesla the situation is rather different, more dedicated fans that are more likely to log trips. with 7354 logged trips and only 259 vehicles logged in last 30 days, there is over 20 logged trips for each vehicle so you find a large proportion of the vehicles.

For Tesla vehicles identified in
last 60 days 289
last 30 days 259
last 14 days 150
last 7 days 66

The drop from 289 to 259 may well be vehicles that Tesla is no longer using as robotaxis. The declines as we look at shorter more recent period is likely a combination of:

Possible drop of in use of Tesla robotaxis following excitement at the cybercab launch, and
Reduced logging of trip because as the cybercab becomes less novel.

Unfortunately I don't really see how to attribute the dropping numbers between those causes. Maybe the increases in that 7354 trips logged number over the next week together with the how the 289 259 150 and 66 numbers change by a weeks time might be useful and provide more insight?

crowdtracker 255 tesla robotaxi. 40 cybercabs added to austin

posted by Elon this morning. Texas registration yesterday passed 420 vehicles. crowdtrackers 209+. 2000+ cybercabs built and able to build 2000+ per week.

But Cybercabs are everywhere. Tampa, Dallas, Houston etc...

Tampa Latest ™ on Instagram: "🚕 Tesla is making a major move on Dale Mabry as its robotaxi expansion continues in Tampa. The company has leased roughly 11 acres at 4636 N. Dale Mabry Highway, a former automotive dealership that’s now being transformed into a new Tesla hub. The property is expected to support Tesla’s growing robotaxi fleet, while also operating as a traditional showroom and service center. Tesla is currently putting a multimillion-dollar investment into renovations, with the site expected to be completed and open by early January 2027. The location sees roughly 75,000 vehicles per day and sits near Tampa International Airport. Interestingly, Waymo previously pursued the same property before Tesla ultimately secured the lease. Tesla launched its robotaxi service in Tampa in July, with operations covering portions of Ybor City, Tampa Heights and West Tampa. Would you ride in a Tesla robotaxi around Tampa? 👀"
2,286 likes, 144 comments - tampalatest on September 2, 2026: "🚕 Tesla is making a major move on Dale Mabry as its robotaxi expansion continues in Tampa. The company has leased roughly 11 acres at 4636 N. Dale Mabry Highway, a former automotive dealership that’s now being transformed into a new Tesla hub. The property is expected to support Tesla’s growing robotaxi fleet, while also operating as a traditional showroom and service center. Tesla is currently putting a multimillion-dollar investment into renovations, with the site expected to be completed and open by early January 2027. The location sees roughly 75,000 vehicles per day and sits near Tampa International Airport. Interestingly, Waymo previously pursued the same property before Tesla ultimately secured the lease. Tesla launched its robotaxi service in Tampa in July, with operations covering portions of Ybor City, Tampa Heights and West Tampa. Would you ride in a Tesla robotaxi around Tampa? 👀".

@TimothyJohnson5c16 I believe 100 can now resolve as YES: https://robotaxitracker.com/

@MaxA Numbers seem a bit strange. It says 186 registered in Texas, that is about what I remember from a couple of months ago and then it seemed that most of these weren't in use. The ones in use added up to only around 60ish. The vehicle miles travelled April to June was at a lower rate but the graphs show steady increases in numbers perhaps hinting at not all of these vehicles being tracked are in paid use?

The site also says Austin 153 Dallas 29 Houston 30 which adds up to more than the number registered in Texas. If the recent increases are real it will soon be obvious that this claim can be resolved yes for 100, but maybe it is too soon to have a quick reaction to those numbers?

https://www.theverge.com/transportation/982759/tesla-robotaxi-unsupervised-austin-robotaxi-tracker

only 28 last week. If increase is real due to people trying to get invite to launch event then perhaps that is a stunt. If it dies back down afterwards, not sure whether creator will count that as sufficiently persistent to be called "actively operating".

@ChristopherRandles The tracker's interface is not great. But here's how to see the number that I think should confirm the resolution: Click "Tesla" box on the top. Then in the line above the map, click "7d" - which I consider to be the most reasonable approximation of the currently active fleet (1 day is too short - remember, this is community submitted stats; 30 days is too long - enough time for a vehicle to exit the fleet). Right now, that shows 113 unsupervised vehicles across all cities.

bought Ṁ150 YES

If 500+ robotaxi in austin and SF bay area. Likely 100 in Austin. N=100 likely true already but can wait to feb and march for it to be obvious.

@brianwang I'm checking whether to resolve N=100, but I'm not confident on how many of the current robotaxis actually have no human in the driver's seat. Do you know a source for that?

sold Ṁ46 YES

@TimothyJohnson5c16
AI overview
"As of March 2026, Tesla’s active Robotaxi fleet is reported to be approximately 400 vehicles. This fleet is concentrated in two primary U.S. markets, with 355 vehicles operating in the San Francisco Bay Area and 45 in Austin."

San Francisco Bay Area are all in drivers seat. Some of the Austin taxis with highway driving or maybe when raining heavily use drivers seat but I am not clear on this split. Anyway less than ~45 seems like it is not over 100 yet.

Tesla executives stated on today's Q4 2025 earnings call (January 28, 2026) that Robotaxi operations in Austin have progressed to having no chase cars (follow vehicles), in addition to no safety monitors in the vehicle itself.

Ashok Elluswamy (VP of AI Software) "We were able to do our first rides with no safety monitor in the car in Austin. These were paid rides, so these were just sort of randomly selected paid rides with no safety monitor. I think maybe as of maybe yesterday or so, we actually don’t even have a chase car or anything like that. So these are just cars with no people in them, and no one's following the car in Austin."

Elon Musk -"Well, it is 100% unsupervised. FSD is 100% unsupervised. I mean, we obviously have cars operating with no one in them and no safety monitor and no follow car or anything like that in Austin right now."

https://electrek.co/2025/11/26/elon-musk-slashes-tesla-robotaxi-fleet-goal-austin/

New promise is to "double" Austin fleet by end of year, which is far short of what Elon predicted a few months ago.

@TimothyJohnson5c16 Do the current 10 or so robotaxis count for your criteria? E.g. with the safety monitor in the car.

@MarkosGiannopoulos Yeah, I'll be generous and count anything without a human in the driver's seat, so the current count is about 10.

Of course, I expect they'll need to remove the safety monitors to scale the system.

sold Ṁ153 NO

Do private Teslas with FSD activated count as robotaxis?

Do private Teslas made available for carsharing count as robotaxis?

My main distinction here would be explicitly produced and used cybercabs vs other teslas owned by carsharing services or private owners

@tobiasscheuer My definition would be that someone can request a ride on-demand, just like with Uber or Lyft. It would still count if the riders have to join a waitlist first.

Carsharing by private owners or third-party services is going to be tricky to measure, and I'm not sure exactly what data will be available. But I'll try to determine the fleet size based on the total number of Teslas actually used for autonomous rides by someone other than the owner at least once within any given week. That seems like the most reasonable definition of "actively operating".

@TimothyJohnson5c16 I agree that with this definition this is going to be tricky. Initially I went with the title implication of the company Tesla owning&operateing N robotaxis. Like this it's going to be hard to predict and resolve. Since you are even trading in this market I cannot participate.
I hope when the time comes around to resolve everything goes well :)