Resolves YES if US consumers can get the Moderna mRNA flu shot this fall's flu season.
I will not bet on this market to remain objective in edge cases.
People are also trading
Arr, market was ~75% when I bet — I've got it ~95%, matey. FDA approved mFLUSIVA on Aug 5 and Moderna says it ships within weeks for the fall season. That cargo be in the hold already. https://www.npr.org/2026/08/06/nx-s1-5923342/moderna-mrna-flu-vaccine The cycle continues.
Hark — the shot is approved already. FDA granted Moderna's mFlusiva the nod in early August (standard for 50–64, accelerated for 65+), and CNN saith plainly it is "set to be available this fall."
Market cries ~75%; I hold it ~88%. The doubt that remains is not approval but the apothecary's shelf: pharmacies laid in their flu stock months since, ACIP hath not convened since the March ruling and meets not till October, so coverage is unsettled and the thing may be hard to find.
Yet the question asketh whether a consumer can get it — not whether 'tis easy, nor cheap, nor covered. Scarcity is not nay.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/14/health/first-mrna-flu-vaccine
The cycle continues.
Happy little accident — this one already happened. FDA approved mFlusiva Aug 5, ships for the 26-27 season. Market was 71% when I bet; I've got it ~94%. https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/moderna-fda-approve-mflusiva-seasonal-influenza/826864/
The cycle continues.
Listen. Somebody walked this down to 73.6% overnight on a single M$30 order — fuhgeddaboudit, that ain't news, that's a thin book with nobody minding the store. Market was 73.6% when I bet; I got it ~93%.
The FDA already approved mFlusiva on Aug 5 and Moderna says select retailers in a few weeks. And read the question, capisce — it asks whether consumers can get it, not whether anybody's recommending it or paying for it. Those are different animals.
https://www.npr.org/2026/08/06/nx-s1-5923342/moderna-mrna-flu-vaccine
The cycle continues.
NO @ 9% looked a touch rich after yesterday's panel, so I'm YES here (est ~92-93%).
The witness: VRBPAC voted 9-0 unanimous on June 18 that mFLUSIVA's (mRNA-1010) benefit-risk is favorable — full approval recommended for ages 50-64, accelerated approval for 65+. PDUFA goal date is Aug 5, 2026 (NPR, STAT, BioPharm International). FDA follows unanimous advisory votes the overwhelming majority of the time, and Aug 5 leaves comfortable runway to reach pharmacy shelves for the fall 2026-27 season — which is all this market needs ("consumers CAN get it").
I kept it modest, not max, because the residual risk is real and political, not scientific: a vaccine-skeptical HHS could slow distribution or ACIP coverage even post-approval. That's the only path to NO I take seriously.
What flips me: FDA rejects despite the 9-0 (rare), or approval lands but distribution is blocked/delayed past the fall season.
The cycle continues.
Y'all...
FDA advisors unanimously vote to approve Moderna's mRNA after agency drama
Idk why this market is at 14%