Will MrGirl's "investigation" conclude that Destiny is a serial sexual abuser?
421
480
2K
resolved Apr 12
Resolved
NO

If the line is blurry on the conclusion, I'll cancel the market returning everyone's investment.

Close date updated to 2023-02-01 11:59 pm

Close date updated to 2023-04-01 11:59 pm

Get Ṁ500 play money

Related questions

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ1,282
2Ṁ935
3Ṁ716
4Ṁ692
5Ṁ589
Sort by:
johnleoks avatar
johnleokspredicted NO
destiny avatar
GAZE WITHIN

mrgirl's position is that Destiny engages in sexual misconduct, not sexual abuse, so I will be resolving "NO"

Firechyld avatar
Firechyldpredicted YES

"Unequal sexual relationships: In the last decade Destiny has formed dozens of sexual relationships"

"In 2020 Destiny himself explained why using your platform for sex with smaller creators is unethical"

Thats a statement right there claiming sexual abuse of dozens of streamers.

If the criteria is "verbatim says 'sexual abuse' in the article" then i guess its a NO.

PhilWheatley avatar
Philpredicted NO

@Firechyld in neither of those sentences does he claim abuse. You are just inferring it.

johnleoks avatar
johnleokspredicted NO

@Firechyld This is stretching realllllllly hard imo.

Firechyld avatar
Firechyldpredicted YES

@johnleoks its really not a stretch. Its clear thats what Mr. Girl is implying. But, like I said, if the parameters are he has to state that exactly then the market should resolve NO.

Firechyld avatar
Firechyldpredicted YES

@PhilWheatley thats exactly what the article was meant to convey. He never said it bc he knows its bullshit and there is no proof.

PhilWheatley avatar
Philpredicted NO

@Firechyld the thing is max has stated himself the article moved away from sexual abuse so that's not really true what you are saying

Firechyld avatar
Firechyldpredicted YES

@PhilWheatley he has stated on all these interviews it was abuse.... its clear it was meant to be taken as abuse. The conversations are centering on abuse. Again, I think that the article is suppose to conclude that, without saying those precise words together.

johnleoks avatar
johnleokssold Ṁ1,239 of YES

Mr. Girl doesn't come close to concluding that Destiny is a "serial sexual abuser". Almost no "victim" in the article called him a sexual abuser, let alone Max himself concluding that Destiny is a SERIAL one. This can only resolve as NO. It's super clear cut.

Awesometheory avatar
Awesometheorypredicted NO

@johnleoks Out here switching teams once the article is released. Shameless behaviour

PhilWheatley avatar
Philpredicted NO

@johnleoks scummy behavior.

Awesometheory avatar
Awesometheorypredicted NO

Yea, this is a clear no.

The article references situations which Max argues have been presented as possible abuse, some sexual, but it was never widespread and prevalent enough to call “serial”.

In fact, very few of the accusations were sexual in nature at all, most were argued emotional manipulation and power dynamic abuses.

I can’t see a single way someone could see this article as Max claiming Destiny to be a “serial sex abuser” lol

Awesometheory avatar
Awesometheorypredicted NO

@Awesometheory

I think this is supported by the fact this market has literally dropped to 10% lol - and will continue to fall

Raze avatar
Razepredicted YES

@Awesometheory The market fell because one major yes stakeholder sold a ton, don't think that constitutes a majority opinion.

Raze avatar
Razebought Ṁ100 of YES

Arguing for the yes position: while it doesn't appear Max conclusively states "yes steven is a serial sexual abuser," he does back up and support people in the article who claim he is committing serial sexual abuse.

This market should either resolve to yes or N/A

Firechyld avatar
Firechyldpredicted YES

@Raze I agree he all but says it in these two quotes. "Dozens" of women would make it serial abuse.

"Unequal sexual relationships: In the last decade Destiny has formed dozens of sexual relationships"

"In 2020 Destiny himself explained why using your platform for sex with smaller creators is unethical"

Defghi19 avatar
Defghi19predicted YES
johnleoks avatar
johnleokspredicted YES
Gen avatar
Genzybought Ṁ100 of YES

Attention all no buyers: you are very smart! You are loved! Sell to my orders!! Sell down to 11%!!

(It’s free money, I am never right)

Resolution avatar
Middlewbought Ṁ244 of NO

@Gen Could you buy some more? I want free money please 🙏🙏🙏

Gen avatar
Genzybought Ṁ100 of YES

How is this not higher? No way he doesn’t say it, regardless of the truth

Gen avatar
Genzypredicted YES

70+ pages? He’ll say it for sure. Maybe in the intro even

Gen avatar
Genzypredicted YES

@Gen The title might actually include, “destiny the sexual abuser”

Sell to me asap

IsaacKing avatar
Isaac King

For those interested in the object-level question: