@Firechyld in neither of those sentences does he claim abuse. You are just inferring it.

@Firechyld This is stretching realllllllly hard imo.

@johnleoks its really not a stretch. Its clear thats what Mr. Girl is implying. But, like I said, if the parameters are he has to state that exactly then the market should resolve NO.

@PhilWheatley thats exactly what the article was meant to convey. He never said it bc he knows its bullshit and there is no proof.

@Firechyld the thing is max has stated himself the article moved away from sexual abuse so that's not really true what you are saying

@johnleoks Out here switching teams once the article is released. Shameless behaviour

@johnleoks scummy behavior.

@Awesometheory

I think this is supported by the fact this market has literally dropped to 10% lol - and will continue to fall

@Awesometheory The market fell because one major yes stakeholder sold a ton, don't think that constitutes a majority opinion.

@Raze I agree he all but says it in these two quotes. "Dozens" of women would make it serial abuse.

"Unequal sexual relationships: In the last decade Destiny has formed dozens of sexual relationships"

"In 2020 Destiny himself explained why using your platform for sex with smaller creators is unethical"

@Gen Could you buy some more? I want free money please 🙏🙏🙏

70+ pages? He’ll say it for sure. Maybe in the intro even

@Gen The title might actually include, “destiny the sexual abuser”

Sell to me asap

@superxad The investigation hasn't concluded yet.

@Canechurch Unfortunately it seems like that was an imposter. https://manifold.markets/yaboi69/is-mrgirl-really-mrgirl-deadline-fo

@DavidDavidson Ah big rip.

@LilSnugglyMane no

I don't think Mr. Girl will straight up say Destiny is a serial sexual abuser. The Ana stuff is probably the worst thing his investigation is going to find, and iirc he hasn't called that sexual abuse. imo it will probably be a blurry line, where he says it's emotional abuse and sexual misconduct but not really sexual abuse.

Although tbf I lost a lot of money on the 'Will Mr. Girl return to stream before Nov 12th" market, so Max unexpectedly escalating the claims isn't unprecedented.

@MattAnderson In my case its because of the severe lack of evidence.

Also did they get rid of tips?

@DavidDavidson That's my point though. He's so set on taking down Steve it doesn't matter if there is or not he'll conclude it anyway.

@MattAnderson naw i think he is gonna have to take the L and just call it emotional abuse, which i dont agree with even that btw.

@SmithJohn It'll probably resolve no, but the bridge is likely never getting repaired.

@LLLLLL Genius

@WOOF Wait a damn second. For the sake of the bet, it should be made clear if misconduct = abuse. I think misconduct is not abuse in a legal sense. In a psychological sense it can be. How are we determining this?

@Smeth I don't think any of this is in the legal sense

@WOOF There is a difference between calling someone "abusive" and calling them an "abuser." This is what justifies the legal distinction, intent being the most important factor. From the perspective that intent is critical, misconduct implies someone is abusive, not an abuser... From a psychological perspective intent does not matter, because we are describing behaviors however they manifest. I would argue that the majority of people do NOT engage within this psychological framework, but more of an empirical framework, and law is the standard there.

@WOOF I just realized that I don't need to stake out this distinction, because the stock reads "sexual abuser" and I am confident that my no stocks will win regardless of this distinction.

@Smeth I think you're over thinking this, this is MrGirl, not law enforcement, but now you got me over thinking it. @destiny can we get a ruling? is this in regards to the legal sense? like is destiny is forcing himself on others without out consent (sexual assault) or is this in regards to MrGirl thinking Destiny uses his position as a streamer to exploit his orbiters sexually?

@WOOF https://www.justia.com/injury/sexual-abuse/

sexual abuse, not assault.

Still I actually don't think the distinction will matter for the sake of my bet, and I'm willing to give up on it, but maybe for others it matters.

@Smeth Read what you linked.

@WOOF It includes coercion and sexual harassment as part of it, while sexual assault does not. I am betting that mrgirl won't find any instances of coercion or harassment.

@Smeth coercion is what he is accusing destiny of and already believes that at least 1 person was coerced.

@WOOF I am betting that mrgirl won't find any instances of coercion or harassment.

@JaimeSantos MrGirl is the one conducting the investigation and he’s approaching it as though Destiny is guilty. Nothing will change his mind